Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Cost effectiveness (2)
- AJIL (1)
- Administrative agencies (1)
- American Journal of International Law (1)
- Consequentialism (Ethics) (1)
-
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Crime statistic (1)
- Eleventh Amendment (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Eviction policies (1)
- Firearm assault (1)
- Gun death (1)
- Homicide rate (1)
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (1)
- International Court of Justice (ICJ) (1)
- International litigation (1)
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Julian Eule (1)
- Lethal violence (1)
- National Institute of Justice Journal (1)
- Proceduralism (1)
- Process theory (1)
- Public housing authority (PHA) (1)
- Public housing communities (1)
- Searching scrutiny (1)
- Section 8 (1)
- Tenant organization (1)
- Treaty based claim (1)
- Treaty violation (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Crime In Public Housing: Clarifying Research Issues, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Tamara Dumanovsky, J. Phillip Thompson, Garth Davies
Crime In Public Housing: Clarifying Research Issues, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Tamara Dumanovsky, J. Phillip Thompson, Garth Davies
Faculty Scholarship
In recent years, crime and public housing have been closely linked in our political and popular cultures. Tragic episodes of violence have reinforced the notion that public housing is a milieu with rates of victimization and offending far greater than other locales. However, these recent developments belie the complex social and political evolution of public housing from its origins in the 1930s, through urban renewal, and into the present.
Stereotypes abound about public housing, its management, residents, and crime rates. In reality, variation is the norm, and it is these variations that affect crime. The study of crime in public …
The Contradictions Of Mainstream Constitutional Theory, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Gary Peller
The Contradictions Of Mainstream Constitutional Theory, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Gary Peller
Faculty Scholarship
For the last four decades, some form of "process" theory has dominated conventional constitutional theory, on the bench and in the academy. The organizing, usually implicit, background assumption is that the exercise of governmental power – whether by legislatures or courts – is to be tested for normative legitimacy against a set of procedures. Writing as critics of the basic framework of process theory, Professors Kimberli Crenshaw and Gary Peller discuss the contributions and constraints of a proceduralist constitutional law discourse. In light of direct democracy initiatives claiming the power of legislation, and a substantively conservative judiciary defining the "law," …
Declining Homicide In New York City: A Tale Of Two Trends, Jeffery Fagan, Franklin E. Zimring, June Kim
Declining Homicide In New York City: A Tale Of Two Trends, Jeffery Fagan, Franklin E. Zimring, June Kim
Faculty Scholarship
The mass media pay plenty of attention to crime and violence in the United States, but very few of the big stories on the American crime beat can be classified as good news. The driveby shootings and carjackings that illuminate nightly news broadcasts are the opposite of good tidings. Most efforts at prevention and law enforcement seem more like reactive attempts to contain ever expanding problems rather than discernable public triumphs. In recent American history, crime rates seem to increase on the front page and moderate in obscurity.
The recent decline in homicides in New York City is an exception …
Incommensurability And Cost-Benefit Analysis, Matthew D. Adler
Incommensurability And Cost-Benefit Analysis, Matthew D. Adler
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Law And Incommensurability: Introduction, Matthew D. Adler
Law And Incommensurability: Introduction, Matthew D. Adler
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Justiciability Of Paraguay's Claim Of Treaty Violation, Lori Fisler Damrosch
The Justiciability Of Paraguay's Claim Of Treaty Violation, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
The U.S. Government's position asserting nonjusticiability of the treaty claims raised by Paraguay in the domestic and international lawsuits is disturbing. The Government's amicus filings at the court of appeals and the Supreme Court denied that Paraguay's claims belonged in federal court (or indeed in any court at all); at the International Court of Justice, the United States admitted a treaty violation but denied the competence of that tribunal to enter a judicial remedy. At one or another phase of these proceedings, the U.S. Government pressed a variety of arguments that (if accepted) would rule out virtually any judicial consideration …