Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bigotry (2)
- Obergefell v. Hodges (2)
- Civil commitment (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Civility (1)
-
- Conditional release (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Donald J. Trump (1)
- Emotions (1)
- Equality (1)
- Ethorobotic (1)
- Gay and lesbian rights (1)
- Harper Lee (1)
- Hypothesis (1)
- Incarceration (1)
- Justice Kennedy (1)
- LGBT (1)
- LGBTQ (1)
- LGBTQ rights (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Masahiro mori (1)
- Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (1)
- Misperception (1)
- Morality (1)
- Post-incaceration (1)
- Public accommodations law (1)
- Public perception (1)
- Racism (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Unnecessary And Unfortunate Focus On “Animus,” “Bare Desire To Harm,” And “Bigotry” In Analyzing Opposition To Gay And Lesbian Rights, James E. Fleming
The Unnecessary And Unfortunate Focus On “Animus,” “Bare Desire To Harm,” And “Bigotry” In Analyzing Opposition To Gay And Lesbian Rights, James E. Fleming
Faculty Scholarship
I am delighted to participate in this symposium on Professor Linda C. McClain’s wonderful new book, Who’s the Bigot? Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law. All of the other papers in this symposium focus on Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (and thus connect with Chapter Eight of her book, on claims of religious exemptions from protections of gay and lesbian rights), while my piece will join issue with the related Chapter Seven, on bigotry, motives, and morality in the Supreme Court’s gay and lesbian rights cases. In this brief Essay, I cannot do justice …
Response To Commentaries On Who’S The Bigot?, Linda C. Mcclain
Response To Commentaries On Who’S The Bigot?, Linda C. Mcclain
Faculty Scholarship
One of the joys of writing a book is the chance to have its arguments and observations evaluated by creative and engaged readers. I am very grateful that the scholars included in this book symposium provided such constructive commentary on the manuscript of my book, Who’s the Bigot? Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law. One of those commentators, Professor Imer Flores, also generously hosted a wonderful live conference at which I had the chance to hear and engage with early versions of several of these commentaries. The final book, I hope, reflects improvements that grew out of …
Privacy As Pretext, Susan Hazeldean
It’S Still Me: Safeguarding Vulnerable Transgender Elders, Sarah Steadman
It’S Still Me: Safeguarding Vulnerable Transgender Elders, Sarah Steadman
Faculty Scholarship
Transgender individuals have many reasons to be concerned about their welfare in the current political and legislative climate. Transgender elders are especially vulnerable. They are more likely to be disabled than the general elder population. Moreover, transgender elders profoundly fear a future when they must rely on others to maintain and protect their gender identity and dignity. This fear is alarmingly realistic because if a transgender elder becomes incapacitated or requires institutional care, they are likely to face discrimination and other harms by their caretakers. In addition, transgender elders who are incapacitated are particularly at-risk if a non-affirming guardian is …
The “Uncanny Valley” And The Verisimilitude Of Sexual Offenders–Part I: An “Ethorobotic” Perspective, Michael T. Flannery
The “Uncanny Valley” And The Verisimilitude Of Sexual Offenders–Part I: An “Ethorobotic” Perspective, Michael T. Flannery
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.