Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Ninth Circuit's Perry Decision And The Constitutional Politics Of Marriage Equality, William N. Eskridge
The Ninth Circuit's Perry Decision And The Constitutional Politics Of Marriage Equality, William N. Eskridge
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In Perry v. Brown, the Ninth Circuit ruled that California’s Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protection Clause. Reacting to the state supreme court’s recognition of marriage equality for lesbian and gay couples, Proposition 8 was a 2008 voter initiative that altered the state constitution to “restore” the “traditional” understanding of civil marriage to exclude same-sex couples. The major theme of the Yes-on-Eight campaign was that the state should not deem lesbian and gay unions to be “marriages” because schoolchildren would then think that lesbian and gay relationships are just as good as straight “marriages.”
Proposition 8 intended that gay …
A Marriage Is A Marriage Is A Marriage: The Limits Of Perry V. Brown, Robin West
A Marriage Is A Marriage Is A Marriage: The Limits Of Perry V. Brown, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Perry v. Brown, authored by Judge Reinhardt, has been widely lauded by marriage equality proponents for its creative minimalism. In keeping with commentators’ expectations, the court found a way to determine that California’s Proposition 8 violated the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause, namely that the provision took away an entitlement that had previously been enjoyed by same-sex couples—the right to the appellation of one’s partnership as a “marriage”—for no rational reason. The people of California’s categorization and differential treatment of same-sex couples as compared with opposite-sex couples, the court held, failed the test of …