Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (2)
- Appraisal (1)
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores (1)
- Bribery (1)
- Corruption (1)
-
- Deterrence (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Dissent (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Insider trading (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securities Act of 1933 (1)
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1)
- Securities and Exchange Act (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Shareholders (1)
- Standing (1)
- Stock markets (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing Under Rule 10b-5 After Blue Chip Stamps, Michigan Law Review
Standing Under Rule 10b-5 After Blue Chip Stamps, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this Note is to analyze the opinion in Blue Chip and to ascertain the content of the Birnbaum rule as it exists today. It will first discuss the opinion of the Court in Blue Chip itself and delineate the primary policy considerations upon which the majority focused. It will then apply these policy considerations to the major categories of case law that have arisen subsequent to Birnbaum and analyze the validity of this case law in light of Blue Chip.
Foreign Bribes And The Securities Acts' Disclosure Requirements, Michigan Law Review
Foreign Bribes And The Securities Acts' Disclosure Requirements, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require most major corporations to disclose to investors all material information concerning company operations. Although they were not intended to regulate the conduct of business, these disclosure obligations can have a deterrent effect upon improper corporate activities. The recent revelation that a significant number of corporations have been making bribes and similar payments abroad has created interest in the feasibility of employing the disclosure requirements to curtail this practice. This Note will show that, despite recent pressures for change, the Securities and Exchange Commission has continued to view …
A Framework For The Allocation Of Prevention Resources With A Specific Application To Insider Trading, Michigan Law Review
A Framework For The Allocation Of Prevention Resources With A Specific Application To Insider Trading, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note enumerates and analyzes the three principal forces that induce individuals to abide by societal laws. These forces, or elements of effective prevention, are then combined to form a framework of general deterrence that both identifies the areas in which society can introduce resources into the prevention plan and explains in a general manner what the effect of particular expenditures will be. In the final section of the Note, the framework is applied to a specific prohibited activity-insider trading in securities-to exemplify its utility in determining more effective applications of prevention resources.
A Reconsideration Of The Stock Market Exception To The Dissenting Shareholder's Right Of Appraisal, Michigan Law Review
A Reconsideration Of The Stock Market Exception To The Dissenting Shareholder's Right Of Appraisal, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note engages in such a reassessment. It contends, first, that appraisal has not been an unreasonable burden on corporations and that adjustments in the appraisal procedure can eliminate remaining inequities. Next, it asserts that the stock market exception inadequately protects the dissenting shareholder, since a market might, for a variety of reasons, price a shareholder's stock at less than its intrinsic value. Finally, this Note concludes that an appraisal procedure with modifications, and not the stock market exception, reflects the appropriate balance of corporate and shareholder interests.
Controlling Administrative Sanctions, Fredrich H. Thomforde Jr.
Controlling Administrative Sanctions, Fredrich H. Thomforde Jr.
Michigan Law Review
This Article will consider some of the possibilities for controlling and guiding the SEC's discretion to impose sanctions upon broker-dealers. Although it is limited to an examination of the Commission's practice and a discussion of possibilities for reform, the analysis contains obvious implications for any agency with the power to impose sanctions.