Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sec Disciplinary Proceedings Against Attorneys Under Rule 2 ( E ), Michigan Law Review
Sec Disciplinary Proceedings Against Attorneys Under Rule 2 ( E ), Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note reassesses SEC authority to discipline attorneys under rule 2( e ). Part I explores the history of rule 2( e) proceedings against attorneys and the troublesome policy issues raised by the SEC's new approach to rule 2(e) enforcement. Part II examines the SEC's claim that general rulemaking provisions give it authority to discipline attorneys. The Note concludes that a proper construction of statutes and case law bars rule 2( e) proceedings against attorneys.
Implied Private Rights Of Action Under The Securities Act Of 1933 Section 17(A), Steven M. Stankewicz
Implied Private Rights Of Action Under The Securities Act Of 1933 Section 17(A), Steven M. Stankewicz
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article considers the existence of a private right of action under Securities Act section 17(a). Part I examines the evolving implication doctrines, and their applicability to section 17(a).Part II discusses the need for a statutory solution and the treatment of implied rights of action under the American Law Institute's proposed Federal Securities Code.