Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Algorithmic accountability law (1)
- Artificial intelligence (AI) (1)
- Automated decision-making (ADM) tools (1)
- Autonomous vehicles (1)
- Biometric ID databases (1)
-
- Citizenship databases (1)
- Criminal intelligence databases (1)
- DNA Databases and law enforcement (1)
- DNA Surveillance (1)
- DNA collection (1)
- Emerging surveillance technologies (1)
- Exclusionary rule to pretextual traffic stops (1)
- Gang databases (1)
- Gangs Matrix (1)
- Habitual offender registration (1)
- Homeland Advance Recognition Technology System (HART) (1)
- Katz v. United States (1)
- National Register of Citizens (NRC) (1)
- Olmstead v. United States (1)
- Predictive policing (1)
- Pretextual traffic stops (1)
- Probable cause and traffic stops (1)
- Racial profiling (1)
- Reasonable expectation of privacy (1)
- Search and seizure law (1)
- Search incident to arrest doctrine (1)
- Self-driving vehicles (1)
- Semi-autonomous world (1)
- Suspect Development Systems (SDS) (1)
- Third party doctrine (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Suspect Development Systems: Databasing Marginality And Enforcing Discipline, Rashida Richardson, Amba Kak
Suspect Development Systems: Databasing Marginality And Enforcing Discipline, Rashida Richardson, Amba Kak
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Algorithmic accountability law—focused on the regulation of data-driven systems like artificial intelligence (AI) or automated decision-making (ADM) tools—is the subject of lively policy debates, heated advocacy, and mainstream media attention. Concerns have moved beyond data protection and individual due process to encompass a broader range of group-level harms such as discrimination and modes of democratic participation. While a welcome and long overdue shift, the current discourse ignores systems like databases, which are viewed as technically “rudimentary” and often siloed from regulatory scrutiny and public attention. Additionally, burgeoning regulatory proposals like algorithmic impact assessments are not structured to surface important –yet …
Deprogramming Bias: Expanding The Exclusionary Rule To Pretextual Traffic Stop Using Data From Autonomous Vehicle And Drive-Assistance Technology, Joe Hillman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
As autonomous vehicles become more commonplace and roads become safer, this new technology provides an opportunity for courts to reconsider the constitutional rationale of modern search and seizure law. The Supreme Court should allow drivers to use evidence of police officer conduct relative to their vehicle’s technological capabilities to argue that a traffic stop was pretextual, meaning they were stopped for reasons other than their supposed violation. Additionally, the Court should expand the exclusionary rule to forbid the use of evidence extracted after a pretextual stop. The Court should retain some exceptions to the expanded exclusionary rule, such as when …
Another Katz Moment?: Privacy, Property, And A Dna Database, Claire Mena
Another Katz Moment?: Privacy, Property, And A Dna Database, Claire Mena
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” The understanding of these words seems to shift as new technologies emerge. As law enforcement’s arsenal of surveillance techniques has grown to include GPS tracking, cell phones, and cell site location information (CSLI), the Supreme Court has applied Fourth Amendment protections to these modern tools. Law enforcement continues to use one pervasive surveillance technique without limitations: the routine collection of DNA. In 2013, the Supreme Court in Maryland v. King held that law enforcement may routinely …