Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Patent law (2)
- Technology (2)
- Access to information (1)
- Biomedicine (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
-
- Circumvention (1)
- Colleges and universities (1)
- Congress (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Copyright reform (1)
- Data (1)
- De minimis economic injuries (1)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Electronic discovery (1)
- Electronic evidence (1)
- Electronic records (1)
- Email (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Experimental purpose doctrine (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Hatch-Waxman Act (1)
- Information (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Integra Lifesciences I Ltd. v. Merck KGaA (1)
- Madey v. Duke University (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fair's Fair: An Argument For Mandatory Disclosure Of Technological Protection Measures, Robert C. Denicola
Fair's Fair: An Argument For Mandatory Disclosure Of Technological Protection Measures, Robert C. Denicola
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Section 1201(a)(1) of the Copyright Act prohibits the act of "circumvent[ing] a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work," including, for example, by-passing password protection or encryption intended to restrict access to paying customers. Section 1201(a)(2) prohibits the manufacture or sale of "any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof" primarily designed for the purpose of circumventing access controls on copyrighted works. Additionally, § 1202(b) prohibits the manufacture or sale of products, devices or services primarily designed to circumvent "a technological measure that effectively protects a right of a copyright owner"--for example, a technological measure intended to …
The Experimental Purpose Doctrine And Biomedical Research, Tao Huang
The Experimental Purpose Doctrine And Biomedical Research, Tao Huang
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The experimental use doctrine is a common law rule in patent law that until a few years ago excused accused infringers who made and used patented products or processes on the basis of an experimental, educational, or nonprofit purpose when there was de minimis economic injury to the patent owner and de minimis economic gain to the infringer. While the application of the experimental purpose doctrine was always narrow, two recent Federal Circuit decisions indicate that there is not much left under its aegis. In Madey v. Duke University, the Federal Circuit strictly limited the application of the experimental purpose …
Better, Faster, Cheaper - Later: What Happens When Technologies Are Suppressed, Kurt M. Saunders, Linda Levine
Better, Faster, Cheaper - Later: What Happens When Technologies Are Suppressed, Kurt M. Saunders, Linda Levine
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Some inventions never see the light of day. Others enter the spotlight after long delays and the factors that slowed the arrival of that innovation are ignored. Technology suppression is a real occurrence involving well known and widely used products. In this Article, we examine the topic of technology suppression, seeking to reveal the tactics of suppression and the patterns and conditions under which it occurs. Current examples of US technologies are used to highlight the significance of this phenomenon. We consider related factors, including market and innovation forces, and we identify suppressive tactics, using illustrative cases where patent nonuse …
Electronic Discovery Sanctions In The Twenty-First Century, Shira A. Scheindlin, Kachana Wangkeo
Electronic Discovery Sanctions In The Twenty-First Century, Shira A. Scheindlin, Kachana Wangkeo
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
At the federal level, the Civil Rules Advisory Committee has responded to the "unique and necessary feature of computer systems--the automatic recycling, overwriting, and alteration of electronically stored information"--with a proposed amendment to Rule 37. The proposed Rule 37(f) would shield litigants from sanctions for the destruction of electronic data if the party "took reasonable steps to preserve the information after it knew or should have known the information was discoverable in the action" and "the failure resulted from the loss of the information because of the routine operation of the party's electronic information system." The safe harbor provision would …