Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 30 of 59
Full-Text Articles in Law
Can Accessibility Liberate The "Lost Ark" Of Scholarly Work?: University Library Institutional Repositories Are "Places Of Public Accommodation”, 52 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2019), Raizel Liebler, Gregory Cunningham
Can Accessibility Liberate The "Lost Ark" Of Scholarly Work?: University Library Institutional Repositories Are "Places Of Public Accommodation”, 52 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2019), Raizel Liebler, Gregory Cunningham
UIC Law Review
For any body of knowledge – an ark of power or a corpus of scholarship – to be studied and used by people, it needs to be accessible to those seeking information. Universities, through their libraries, now aim to make more of the scholarship produced available for free to all through institutional repositories. However, the goal of being truly open for an institutional repository is more than the traditional definition of open access. It also means openness in a more general sense. Creating a scholarship-based online space also needs to take into consideration potential barriers for people with disabilities. This …
Smart Machines And Smarter Policy: Foreign Investment Regulation, National Security, And Technology Transfer In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 279 (2018), Justin Shields
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Statutory Patent Reversion Period May End The Debate On Employee Inventions, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 675 (2018), Yucheng Wang
A Statutory Patent Reversion Period May End The Debate On Employee Inventions, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 675 (2018), Yucheng Wang
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Crisis In Scientific Publishing And Its Effect On The Admissibility Of Technical And Scientific Evidence, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2016), Kevin Hill
UIC Law Review
In 1993, the Supreme Court attempted to ensure the reliability of scientific, medical and technical evidence in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Court held that judges act as gate keepers to, and provided various criterion to guide judges in the admissibility of, technical and scientific evidence. This article examines one criterion, peer review publication, to determine whether changes in scientific publishing over the last twenty-three years have weakened peer review’s usefulness as a guide for judges. The author analyzes the decline of peer review, as a clear standard for measuring the reliability of articles, by examining four problems …
Parent In Life, Stranger At Law: Addressing The Inequality And Inconsistency Of Parentage Rights Of Same-Sex Parents, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 867 (2013), Paul Coogan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
(Dis)Service Of Process: The Need To Amend Rule 4 To Comply With Modern Usage Of Technology, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 459 (2012), Svetlana Gitman
(Dis)Service Of Process: The Need To Amend Rule 4 To Comply With Modern Usage Of Technology, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 459 (2012), Svetlana Gitman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Updating The Patent System's Novelty Requirement To Promote Small-Molecule Medicinal Progress, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1151 (2012), Jason Brewer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cloudy With A Chance Of Waiver: How Cloud Computing Complicates The Attorney-Client Privilege, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2012), Timothy Peterson
Cloudy With A Chance Of Waiver: How Cloud Computing Complicates The Attorney-Client Privilege, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2012), Timothy Peterson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Following You Here, There, And Everywhere; An Investigation Of Gps Technology, Privacy, And The Fourth Amendment, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2011), Stephanie G. Forbes
Following You Here, There, And Everywhere; An Investigation Of Gps Technology, Privacy, And The Fourth Amendment, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2011), Stephanie G. Forbes
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Doninger's Wedge: Has Avery Doninger Bridged The Way For Internet Versions Of Matthew Fraser?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 439 (2010), Adam Dauksas
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Photo Enforcement Programs: Are They Permissible Under The United States Constitution?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (2010), Paul Mcnaughton
Photo Enforcement Programs: Are They Permissible Under The United States Constitution?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (2010), Paul Mcnaughton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Far Can The Automobile Exception Go? How Searches Of Computers And Similar Devices Push It To The Limit, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1119 (2010), Andrew Wrona
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unlawful Infringement Or Just Creative Expression? Why Dj Girl Talk May Inspire Congress To "Recast, Transform, Or Adapt" Copyright, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1067 (2010), Katie Simpson-Jones
Unlawful Infringement Or Just Creative Expression? Why Dj Girl Talk May Inspire Congress To "Recast, Transform, Or Adapt" Copyright, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1067 (2010), Katie Simpson-Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
If You Prompt Them, They Will Rule: The Warranty Of Habitability Meets New Court Information Systems, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2007), Mary Marsh Zulack
If You Prompt Them, They Will Rule: The Warranty Of Habitability Meets New Court Information Systems, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2007), Mary Marsh Zulack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patients Beware: Preemption Of Common Law Claims Under The Medical Device Amendments, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 75 (2005), Michael P. Dinatale
Patients Beware: Preemption Of Common Law Claims Under The Medical Device Amendments, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 75 (2005), Michael P. Dinatale
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Courts Are Drowning In The "Gene Pool": Excavating The Slippery Slope Mechanisms Behind Judicial Endorsement Of Dna Databases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2005), Meghan Riley
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Campaign Finance Reform, Electioneering Communications, And The First Amendment: Resuscitating The Third Exception, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1315 (2005), Daniel B. Roth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stemming The Tide Of Stem Cell Research: The Bush Compromise, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1061 (2005), Patrick Walsh
Stemming The Tide Of Stem Cell Research: The Bush Compromise, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1061 (2005), Patrick Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera
Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Keep The Lights On: An Exploration Of The Abrogration Of Wholesale Energy Contracts, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 303 (2004), Brian Bassett
How To Keep The Lights On: An Exploration Of The Abrogration Of Wholesale Energy Contracts, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 303 (2004), Brian Bassett
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Technology Transfer And Economic Development: Proposed Cooperative Economic Development Agreements Under The Bayh-Dole Act, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 397 (2003), Clovia Hamilton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cornering The Market In A Post-9/11 World: The Future Of Horizontal Restraints, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 557 (2003), Daniel Goldberg
Cornering The Market In A Post-9/11 World: The Future Of Horizontal Restraints, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 557 (2003), Daniel Goldberg
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Computer-Aided Drug Design Using Patented Compounds: Infringement In Cyberspace?, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1001 (2001), Ted L. Field
Computer-Aided Drug Design Using Patented Compounds: Infringement In Cyberspace?, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1001 (2001), Ted L. Field
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patenting Industry Standards, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 897 (2001), Janice M. Mueller
Patenting Industry Standards, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 897 (2001), Janice M. Mueller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dna Patentability: Shutting The Door To The Utility Requirement, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2001), Donald L. Zuhn Jr.
Dna Patentability: Shutting The Door To The Utility Requirement, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2001), Donald L. Zuhn Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Electronic Self-Help Provisions Of Ucita: A Virtual Repo Man?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 663 (2000), Craig Dolly
The Electronic Self-Help Provisions Of Ucita: A Virtual Repo Man?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 663 (2000), Craig Dolly
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Twenty-First Century Patent System Improvement Act: Is It Really An Improvement, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 725 (1999), Aimee Boss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deleting The Bolar Amendment To The Hatch-Waxman Act: Harmonizing Pharmaceutical Patent Protection In A Global Village, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 751 (1999), Ned Milenkovich
Deleting The Bolar Amendment To The Hatch-Waxman Act: Harmonizing Pharmaceutical Patent Protection In A Global Village, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 751 (1999), Ned Milenkovich
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
35 U.S.C. 103: From Hotchkiss To Hand To Rich, The Obvious Patent Law Hall-Of-Famers, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 437 (1999), George M. Sirilla
35 U.S.C. 103: From Hotchkiss To Hand To Rich, The Obvious Patent Law Hall-Of-Famers, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 437 (1999), George M. Sirilla
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.