Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Separation of powers (2)
- Agencies (1)
- Bush (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Common law procedures (1)
-
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional borrowing (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Dispute resolution (Law) (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equality (1)
- Executive Powers (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Foreign affairs (1)
- Foreign trade regulation (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- George Mason Law Review (1)
- Globalization (1)
- International commercial arbitration (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Judges--Selection and appointment (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law--Political aspects (1)
- Obama (1)
- President (1)
- Public rights exception (1)
- Reagan (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court As Superweapon: A Response To Epps & Sitaraman, Stephen E. Sachs
Supreme Court As Superweapon: A Response To Epps & Sitaraman, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
Is the Supreme Court's legitimacy in crisis? Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman argue that it is. In their Feature, How to Save the Supreme Court, they suggest legally radical reforms to restore a politically moderate Court. Unfortunately, their proposals might destroy the Court's legitimacy in order to save it. And their case that there is any crisis may fail to persuade a reader with different legal or political priors. If the Supreme Court needs saving, it will be saving from itself, and from too broad a conception of its own legal omnipotence. A Court that seems unbound by legal principle …
Democratic Policing Before The Due Process Revolution, Sarah Seo
Democratic Policing Before The Due Process Revolution, Sarah Seo
Faculty Scholarship
According to prevailing interpretations of the Warren Court’s Due Process Revolution, the Supreme Court constitutionalized criminal procedure to constrain the discretion of individual officers. These narratives, however, fail to account for the Court’s decisions during that revolutionary period that enabled discretionary policing. Instead of beginning with the Warren Court, this Essay looks to the legal culture before the Due Process Revolution to provide a more coherent synthesis of the Court’s criminal procedure decisions. It reconstructs that culture by analyzing the prominent criminal law scholar Jerome Hall’s public lectures, Police and Law in a Democratic Society, which he delivered in 1952 …
Wto Dispute Settlement: Can We Go Back Again?, Rachel Brewster
Wto Dispute Settlement: Can We Go Back Again?, Rachel Brewster
Faculty Scholarship
The world's twenty-year experiment with a rule-based international trading order is most likely ending. Trade wars are raging again for the first time in two decades as World Trade Organization (WTO) members unilaterally impose and counterimpose sanctions. In Geneva, the WTO Appellate Body, whose existence is essential to the functioning of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), is on a trajectory to shut down in December 2020. For all the fireworks, however, many commentators retain an optimism that the recent events will be a passing phase and that the world will return to a more law-oriented trading system after the …
The Trump Administration And The Rule Of Law, Peter L. Strauss
The Trump Administration And The Rule Of Law, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
Written for a French audience in 2017, this article sought to frame the explosive issues about the Trump presidency in relation to the American trend to strong views of the unitary executive, that in the author's view ignore the striking contrast between to propositions in Article II Section 2 of the Constitution, its only words defining presidential power. Made "Commander in chief" of the military, he is next given the power only to require the opinion in writing from the heads of the executive bodies Congress was expected to create how they intended to carry out the duties Congress had …
Fair And Impartial Adjudication, Thomas W. Merrill
Fair And Impartial Adjudication, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Any legal system that purports to respect the rule of law must ensure the fair and impartial adjudication of disputes under the law. Classic accounts of the rule of law assume that courts should resolve such disputes. However, this is too narrow. All forms of adjudication, not just by courts, need to be fair and impartial. In any event, no one could claim that courts or entities by that name are always fair and impartial. All legal systems need a guarantee of fair and impartial adjudication that applies to all forms of dispute resolution under law.
A dispute arising under …
Considerations Of History And Purpose In Constitutional Borrowing, Robert L. Tsai
Considerations Of History And Purpose In Constitutional Borrowing, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
This essay is part of a symposium issue dedicated to "Constitutional Rights: Intersections, Synergies, and Conflicts" at William and Mary School of Law. I make four points. First, perfect harmony among rights might not always be normatively desirable. In fact, in some instances, such as when First Amendment and Second Amendment rights clash, we might wish to have expressive rights consistently trump gun rights. Second, we can't resolve clashes between rights in the abstract but instead must consult history in a broadly relevant rather than a narrowly "originalist" fashion. When we do so, we learn that armed expression and white …