Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ERISA (3)
- Adams v. Cyprus Amax Minerals (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bankruptcy exemptions (1)
- COBRA (1)
-
- Circuit split (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (1)
- Employee benefits (1)
- Employee health plan (1)
- Enhanced benefit claims (1)
- Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp. (1)
- Health insurance (1)
- IRA (1)
- Jury trial (1)
- Patterson v. Shumate (1)
- Pension Laws (1)
- Pension Shield (1)
- Pensions (1)
- Retirement (1)
- Seventh Amendment (1)
- United States. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Looking For A Prince Among The Frogs: Solutions To Erisa's Preemptive Effect On Improving Health Care, Mk Gaedeke Roland
Looking For A Prince Among The Frogs: Solutions To Erisa's Preemptive Effect On Improving Health Care, Mk Gaedeke Roland
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hidden In Plain View: The Pension Shield Against Creditors, Patricia E. Dilley
Hidden In Plain View: The Pension Shield Against Creditors, Patricia E. Dilley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Insuring The Protection Of Erisa Plan Participants: Erisa Preemption And The Federal Government's Duty To Regulate Self-Insured Health Plans, Dennis K. Schaeffer
Insuring The Protection Of Erisa Plan Participants: Erisa Preemption And The Federal Government's Duty To Regulate Self-Insured Health Plans, Dennis K. Schaeffer
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employee Benefits: Erisa Enhanced Benefit Claims And The Seventh Amendment: No Common Ground In The Tenth Circuit-- Adams V. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co., Amy Nixon
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Erisa - The Awarding Of Interest As Other Appropriate Equitable Relief Under Erisa: The Third Circuit Enlarges Interest Recovery In Fotta V. Trustees Of The United Mine Workers, M. Stacey Bach
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cobra Continuation Coverage And The Plain Reading Of The Statute: Geissal V. Moore Medical Corporation , Judith C. Brostron
Cobra Continuation Coverage And The Plain Reading Of The Statute: Geissal V. Moore Medical Corporation , Judith C. Brostron
Journal of Law and Health
This Paper will discuss the relevant statutes, case law and the Supreme Court's opinion in Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp. It concludes that the Supreme Court correctly reversed the Eighth Circuit's opinion in Geissal by applying the plain meaning of the statute and rejecting the "significant gap" theory. James Geissal was entitled to COBRA continuation coverage even though his wife had preexisting group health insurance coverage. The Fifth, Eleventh and Eigth Circuits' significant gap theory is not supported by the plain meaning of the statute or Congress' intent. The employee should have the choice to elect COBRA or decide whether …
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.