Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- ART (1)
- Abortion Jurisprudence (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Arizona (1)
-
- Arizona Supreme Court (1)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (1)
- Babies (1)
- Birth Standard (1)
- Border (1)
- CBP (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Cryopreservation (1)
- Customs and Border Protection (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Embryonic Personhood (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Fertility (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (1)
- Harm (1)
- Humanitarianism (1)
- IVF (1)
- Immigration (1)
- In Vitro Fertilization (1)
- Inadmissible Harms (1)
- Little Sisters of the Poor (1)
- Minorities (1)
- NMD (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
"Water Is Life!" (And Speech!): Death, Dissent, And Democracy In The Borderlands, Jason A. Cade
"Water Is Life!" (And Speech!): Death, Dissent, And Democracy In The Borderlands, Jason A. Cade
Indiana Law Journal
Decades of stringent immigration enforcement along the Southwest border have pushed migrants into perilous desert corridors. Thousands have died in border regions, out of the general public view, yet migrants continue to attempt the dangerous crossings. In response to what they see as a growing humanitarian crisis, activists from organizations such as No More Deaths seek to expand migrant access to water, to honor the human remains of those who did not survive the journey, and to influence public opinion about border enforcement policies. Government officials, however, have employed a range of tactics to repress this border-policy "dissent," including blacklists, …
First Amendment “Harms”, Stephanie H. Barclay
First Amendment “Harms”, Stephanie H. Barclay
Indiana Law Journal
What role should harm to third parties play in the government’s ability to protect religious rights? The intuitively appealing “harm” principle has animated new theories advanced by scholars who argue that religious exemptions are indefensible whenever they result in cognizable harm to third parties. This third-party harm theory is gaining traction in some circles, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s pending cases in Little Sisters of the Poor and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. While focusing on harm appears at first to provide an appealing, simple, and neutral principle for avoiding other difficult moral questions, the definition of harm …
Arizona's Torres V. Terrell And Section 318.03: The Wild West Of Pre-Embryo Disposition, Catherine Wheatley
Arizona's Torres V. Terrell And Section 318.03: The Wild West Of Pre-Embryo Disposition, Catherine Wheatley
Indiana Law Journal
In this Note, Part I examines the three main approaches used in other state supreme court decisions to decide pre-embryo disposition disputes, as well as three perspectives on the legal status of the pre-embryo, and compares them with Arizona’s emerging law. Part II summarizes Arizona’s Torres trial court order and opinion and section 318.03. Part III then analyzes whether the Torres orders and Arizona’s new statutory “most likely to lead to birth standard”12 present constitutional issues and concludes that the trial court’s order, if reinstated by the Arizona Supreme Court, and section 318.03 can be challenged on substantive due process …