Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Conceptual severance (2)
- Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (2)
- Nollan-Dolan doctrine (2)
- Takings clause (2)
- Takings doctrine (2)
-
- Takings jurisprudence (2)
- Classical ownership (1)
- Corporate pension system (1)
- Dolan v. City of Tigard (1)
- ERISA (1)
- ESOPs (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (1)
- Employee Stock Ownership Plans (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles (1)
- James Fanto (1)
- Just compensation (1)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission (1)
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1)
- Passive ownership of property (1)
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1)
- Pension law (1)
- Post-modern takings (1)
- Public use clause (1)
- Regulatory takings (1)
- Regulatory takings doctrine (1)
- Regulatory takings law (1)
- Roberta Karmel (1)
- Social Security privatization (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Pensions And Passivity, Gregory S. Alexander
Pensions And Passivity, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
This article discusses how modem fiduciary law has extended equity's tradition of constructing ownership as passive through the corporate pension system. It examines how the corporate pension system as a mode of owning pooled capital is a new stage of passive ownership. This stage creates a different aspect of the familiar problem of separating control from beneficial ownership. Berle and Means argued that the problem that the separation of control from ownership created was economic. The interests of managers and shareholders in the modern corporation diverge, and, they argued, this divergence diminishes the overall efficiency of the modern economy, dominated …
Takings, Narratives, And Power, Gregory S. Alexander
Takings, Narratives, And Power, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
"The Regulatory Takings Problem" is the title given to a story, or narrative, that has become prominent in the literature on just compensation issues. The story is one of power and fear. It is about a perceived imbalance of power between the two groups of actors involved in the process of public land-use regulation--private landowners and government regulators. It depicts scenarios of past or threatened abuse of power by local land-use regulators, and it looks to the takings clause generally and regulatory takings doctrine specifically as crucial corrective devices, essential to set the power imbalance aright. The dominant narrative describes …
Ten Years Of Takings, Gregory Alexander
Ten Years Of Takings, Gregory Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No area of property law has been more controversial in the past decade than takings. No aspect of constitutional law more sharply poses the dilemma about the legitimate powers of the regulatory state than the just compensation question. No question concerning constitutional property is more intractable than what sorts of government regulatory actions constitute uncompensated "takings" of private property. Limitations of space, not to mention my own ambivalence about many of the issues, prevent me from developing a complete normative theory of the proper scope of the Takings Clause. My aim here is vastly more modest: to outline the basic …
"Takings" Jurisprudence In The U.S. Supreme Court: The Past 10 Years, Gregory S. Alexander
"Takings" Jurisprudence In The U.S. Supreme Court: The Past 10 Years, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No area of American property law has been more controversial in recent years than the government regulation of uses of private property. No aspect of American constitutional law more sharply poses the dilemma about the legitimate powers of the regulatory state than the requirement that the government pay compensation for takings of property. The purpose of this essay is to acquaint the non-American legal scholar who is unfamiliar with the recent developments in the United States Supreme Court “takings” jurisprudence. The essay does not presuppose any background knowledge about either American constitutional or property law. Instead it attempts to familiarize …
Commentary On Presentations Of Prof. Roberta S. Karmel & Prof. James A. Fanto, Gregory S. Alexander
Commentary On Presentations Of Prof. Roberta S. Karmel & Prof. James A. Fanto, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.