Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- And Economic Security (1)
- Appointments Clause (1)
- Black Lawyers (1)
- Blockchain (1)
-
- CARES Act (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Civil Claims (1)
- Civil claims (1)
- Civil courts (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Copyright Infringement (1)
- Coronavirus Aid (1)
- Credit Reporting (1)
- Credit Reporting System (1)
- Credit issues (1)
- Credit reports (1)
- Credit scores (1)
- D.C. Circuit Court (1)
- Economics (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Fair Credit Reporting Act (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Filing Fees (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Floating easements (1)
- In forma pauperis (1)
- Natural Disasters (1)
- Project influence rule (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents and Special Thanks.
Property Owners Look Out: The Train Is Coming, Natalie Crane
Property Owners Look Out: The Train Is Coming, Natalie Crane
Seattle University Law Review
Over 4 million people currently live in the Puget Sound area in Washington state, and about 6 million people are expected to reside in the area by 2050. Additionally, Seattle renters faced a 71.2% increase in rent prices from 2010 to 2019. This data supports the need for much of the congested Seattle population to move outward and commute into the city for work. The implementation of a 116-mile system and other efforts to increase public transportation makes this need achievable and affordable.
This Comment focuses on the issue of just compensation in eminent domain; specifically, unique questions of compensation …
Why Do The Poor Not Have A Constitutional Right To File Civil Claims In Court Under Their First Amendment Right To Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances?, Henry Rose
Seattle University Law Review
Since 1963, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for American groups, organizations, and persons to pursue civil litigation under the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. However, in three cases involving poor plaintiffs decided by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s—Boddie v. Connecticut,2 United States v. Kras,3 and Ortwein v. Schwab4—the Supreme Court rejected arguments that all persons have a constitutional right to access courts to pursue their civil legal claims.5 In the latter two cases, Kras and Ortwein, the Supreme Court concluded that poor persons were properly barred from …
Providing Relief After A Natural Disaster Through Credit Reports, Katherine Wecker
Providing Relief After A Natural Disaster Through Credit Reports, Katherine Wecker
Seattle University Law Review
The COVID-19 pandemic forced the world to re-think systems that have been in place for decades, quickly adapting—at least temporarily— to the new normal. Among those systems was the credit reporting system. In response to the pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; an act that, among other things, amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act in regard to how credit reporting agencies should respond to delinquencies resulting from the pandemic.
This Note argues that to adapt to the increasing occurrence of natural disasters, the U.S. government must implement a system in which a consumer can …