Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accession (1)
- Comity (1)
- Common Foreign and Security Policy (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutionalism (1)
-
- Cooperation (1)
- EU External Relations (1)
- European Convention on Human Rights (1)
- European Union (1)
- Extradition Clause (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Full Faith and Credit Clause (1)
- International relations (1)
- Interstate relations (1)
- Judicial hagiography (1)
- Obligations (1)
- Opinion 2/13 (1)
- Opinion Pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU C-2/13 (1)
- Privileges and Immunities Clause (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- States (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reflections On Comity In The Law Of American Federalism, Gil Seinfeld
Reflections On Comity In The Law Of American Federalism, Gil Seinfeld
Articles
Comity is a nebulous concept familiar to us from the law of international relations. Roughly speaking, it describes a set of reciprocal norms among nations that call for one state to recognize, and sometimes defer to, the laws, judgments, or interests of another. Comity also features prominently in the law of American federalism, but in that context, it operates within limits that have received almost no attention from scholarly commentators. Specifically, although courts routinely describe duties that run from one state to another, or from the federal government to the states, as exercises in comity, they almost never rely on …
It's The Autonomy, Stupid!' A Modest Defense Of Opinion 2/13 On Eu Accession To The Echr, And The Way Forward, Daniel H. Bicket
It's The Autonomy, Stupid!' A Modest Defense Of Opinion 2/13 On Eu Accession To The Echr, And The Way Forward, Daniel H. Bicket
Articles
The Court of Justice of the European Union has arrived! Gone are the days of hagiography, when in the eyes of the academy and informed observers the Court could do no wrong. The pendulum has finally swung the other way. The judicial darling, if there is one today, is Strasbourg, not Luxembourg. Not hours had passed before the Court's 258-paragraph long Opinion 2/13 on the Draft Agreement on EU Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights was condemned as “exceptionally poor.” Critical voices have mounted steadily ever since, leading to nothing short of widespread “outrage.”