Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
-
- Columbia Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- BLR (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida Coastal School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (6)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Touro Law Review (5)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (4)
- Timothy M. Mulvaney (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Carl J. Circo (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Review (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Eduardo M. Peñalver (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Garrett Power (1)
- Gregory S Alexander (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Josh Eagle (1)
- Laura S. Underkuffler (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Patricia E. Salkin (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Stephen Durden (1)
- Supreme Court Case Files (1)
- Testimony Before Congress (1)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 76 of 76
Full-Text Articles in Law
Changing Landscapes And Evolving Law: Lessons From Mono Lake On Takings And The Public Trust, Andrew H. Sawyer
Changing Landscapes And Evolving Law: Lessons From Mono Lake On Takings And The Public Trust, Andrew H. Sawyer
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Property Rights, John D. Echeverria
The Politics Of Property Rights, John D. Echeverria
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Review Of Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics And Politics, By William A. Fischel, William Michael Treanor
Review Of Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics And Politics, By William A. Fischel, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews Regulatory Takings: law, Economics and Politics by William A. Fischel (1997).
William Fischel's Regulatory Takings confronts one of the most difficult and significant questions in constitutional law: how should courts determine which government regulations run afoul of the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, which requires the government to provide compensation when it takes private property? Broadly read, the clause would bar government regulations with redistributive consequences, thus rendering the modern regulatory state unconstitutional. This reading, championed by Professor Richard Epstein, has achieved great prominence in academic and political debates, but the vast preponderance of judges and …
The Armstrong Principle, The Narratives Of Takings, And Compensation Statutes, William Michael Treanor
The Armstrong Principle, The Narratives Of Takings, And Compensation Statutes, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment is famous for inspiring disagreement. More than one hundred years have passed since the Supreme Court departed from the original understanding of the clause and interpreted regulations as potentially falling within its ambit. Although the passage of time has established the principle that regulations can run afoul of the Takings Clause, the Court has been unable to offer a coherent vision of when compensation is required. Academic commentators also have failed to reach agreement on the issue, offering an enormous range of solutions to the takings question. The newest field of controversy involves …
Takings And The Nature Of Property, Laura S. Underkuffler
Takings And The Nature Of Property, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause And The Political Process, William Michael Treanor
The Original Understanding Of The Takings Clause And The Political Process, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The original understanding of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was clear on two points. The clause required compensation when the federal government physically took private property, but not when government regulations limited the ways in which property could be used. In 1922, however, the Supreme Court's decision in Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon established a new takings regime. In an opinion by Justice Holmes, the Court held that compensation must be provided when government regulation "goes too far" in diminishing the value of private property. Since that decision, the Supreme Court has been unable to define clearly what kind …
Takings Law And The Regulatory State: A Response To R.S. Radford, William Michael Treanor
Takings Law And The Regulatory State: A Response To R.S. Radford, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In the Winter 1994 issue of the Fordham Urban Law Journal, R.S. Radford provided an illuminating review of Dennis Coyle's book Property Rights and the Constitution. Radford observes that, in addition to studying post-New Deal land use cases, Coyle "provides an ideological framework that illuminates several key strands in the constitutional jurisprudence of property law ... [and] sets forth his own theories of the vital role of private property in creating and maintaining the American constitutional system." Radford's review is a generally enthusiastic one. He sees Coyle's book as providing a much-needed corrective to "the existing pro-regulatory bias …
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
7 pages.
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
10 pages.
Contains 1 page of references.
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages.
Contains references.
Takings Clause: Saratoga Water Services, Inc. V. Saratoga County Water Authority
Takings Clause: Saratoga Water Services, Inc. V. Saratoga County Water Authority
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harmful Use And The Takings Clause In The Eye Of The Beholder: Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council, Charles H. Clarke
Harmful Use And The Takings Clause In The Eye Of The Beholder: Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council, Charles H. Clarke
Cleveland State Law Review
Whichever of these two possibilities prevails, both possibilities require the courts to perform essentially legislative functions regardless, in other words, of whether public ecological resources receive insufficient or ample protection from private enterprise that wants to consume them. The traditional Takings Clause precedents, on the other hand, would give public ecological resources and private property ample protection with minimum judicial oversight. The traditional position seems preferable for this reason.
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church Of Glendale V. County Of Los Angeles, California, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church Of Glendale V. County Of Los Angeles, California, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Origins And Original Significance Of The Just Compensation Clause Of The Fifth Amendment, William Michael Treanor
The Origins And Original Significance Of The Just Compensation Clause Of The Fifth Amendment, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The principle that the state necessarily owes compensation when it takes private property was not generally accepted in either colonial or revolutionary America. Uncompensated takings were frequent and found justification first in appeals to the crown and later in republicanism, the ideology of the Revolution. The post-independence movement for just compensation requirements at the state and national level was part of a broader ideological shift away from republicanism, which stressed the primacy of the common good, and toward liberalism. At the time the Bill of Rights was adopted, that shift had not been completed, but the trends of the revolutionary …