Law Commons^™

Belk V. Commissioner: Land Substitutions In Conservation Easements, Morgan Davis

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Due Process For Cash Civil Forfeitures In Structuring Cases, Timothy J. Ford

Michigan Law Review

On January 22, 2013, Tarik “Terry” Dehko sat down to pay the bills for his small Michigan grocery store when a federal agent entered his office. The agent told Dehko that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had executed a seizure warrant and taken the market’s entire bank account—more than $35,000. When Dehko asked how he could run his business without its bank account, the agent replied, “I don’t care.” The government did not charge Dehko with a crime that day. In fact, Dehko had never been charged with any crime in his life. Instead, the government waited until July 19 …

Livestock Grazing On Public Lands: Procedures And Issues, E. T. Bartlett

The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10)

17 pages.

Contains references.

Title Examination In Virginia, W. Wade Berryhill

University of Richmond Law Review

The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of the basic procedures of title examination. The emphasis is on the mechanics and practical considerations involved in a search of title. Although the focus of any legal work is "the law," this article is not meant to be a legal treatise. It is rather a practical "how to" guide. The author hopes, however, that this writing will not only acquaint the reader with the basic techniques of title examination but will also assist the title examiner in solving the related problems which arise when some of the more common …

Qualified Disclaimers Of Joint Tenancies: A Policy And Property Law Analysis, Helen E. Hartnell, D. L. Uchtmann

Publications

In light of the present position of the Service on the issue of joint tenancy disclaimers and the importance of this issue in many estates, a thorough analysis of this issue is warranted. The following sections of this Article will examine: 1) whether such a disclaimer should be treated as a "qualified disclaimer" on policy grounds; and 2) whether a disclaimer or the "accretive portion" of a joint tenancy interest by a surviving joint tenant meets the technical requirements of a "qualified disclaimer" under federal law in light of contemporary property law.