Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Case Comment On F. Hoffman-Laroche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. In 'The Supreme Court 2003 Term: Leading Cases. Iii Federal Statutes And Regulations: E. Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act', Daniel Lyons Oct 2004

Case Comment On F. Hoffman-Laroche Ltd. V. Empagran S.A. In 'The Supreme Court 2003 Term: Leading Cases. Iii Federal Statutes And Regulations: E. Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act', Daniel Lyons

Daniel Lyons

No abstract provided.


Dept. Of Labor Increases Union Financial Reporting Requirements, Daniel Lyons Feb 2004

Dept. Of Labor Increases Union Financial Reporting Requirements, Daniel Lyons

Daniel Lyons

No abstract provided.


Treaties, Time Limits And Treasure Trove: The Legal Protection Of Cultural Objects In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee Dec 2003

Treaties, Time Limits And Treasure Trove: The Legal Protection Of Cultural Objects In Singapore, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee

Jack Tsen-Ta LEE

This article considers the extent to which civil and criminal law in Singapore deters the unlawful removal of cultural objects from the possession of private owners, art galleries and museums, or from archaeological sites, and provides redress to victims. Given Singapore's position as the crossroads of Asia, the law must be able to cope with the flow of objects in and out of the country. The law is currently deficient as it is not tailored to deal with issues concerning cultural heritage, and needs to be reformed in several respects. There are sound reasons for a modern State like Singapore …


Association Of American Law Schools Conference: Transcript Of The Sections On Natural Resources In Atlanta, Georgia, Barlow F. Burke Dec 2003

Association Of American Law Schools Conference: Transcript Of The Sections On Natural Resources In Atlanta, Georgia, Barlow F. Burke

Barlow F. Burke

At the end of August 2003, representatives of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia ceased negotiating over a water apportionment formula for an interstate compact governing the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint ("ACF') River Basin ("the Basin" or "the River Basin"). The negotiations began in 1998 after the states stepped back from ongoing litigation. They ended with the probability of future litigation, which might involve the doctrine of equitable apportionment in federal courts and could invoke the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court. The negotiations were the meat of a litigation sandwich. A panel discussed the reasons for the negotiations' failure at the meeting …