Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Property Law and Real Estate

PDF

Campbell University School of Law

1984

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Restrictive Covenants - Enforceability Of Assessments Against Property Owners In Residential Developments - Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Association, Inc. V. Parker, Ernest Rawls Carter Jr., Monty Beck Jan 1984

Restrictive Covenants - Enforceability Of Assessments Against Property Owners In Residential Developments - Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Association, Inc. V. Parker, Ernest Rawls Carter Jr., Monty Beck

Campbell Law Review

The North Carolina Court of Appeals in Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Association v. Parker, rejected the defendant property owner's interpretation of several earlier decisions. The property owner claimed the earlier decisions required affirmative covenants to contain some ascertainable standards by which the court could objectively determine the amount and purposes of the assessments. The Court of Appeals claimed, however, it was applying the same standards set forth in the earlier decisions regarding the enforceability of similar covenants. In essence, the court's adoption of a broader interpretation of the earlier case law validates stricter enforcement of assessment covenants by property …


A Practical Interpretation Of North Carolina's Comprehensive Plan Requirement, Kenneth G. Silliman Jan 1984

A Practical Interpretation Of North Carolina's Comprehensive Plan Requirement, Kenneth G. Silliman

Campbell Law Review

This article offers a practical interpretation of North Carolina's "comprehensive plan" requirement. Although this topic has been frequently analyzed, most other articles have concentrated on criticizing the existing case law and recommending statutory changes. By contrast, this paper is addressed to practicing planners, real estate lawyers and government lawyers who must work within the existing statutory framework. As a basic foundation, the author assumes that legislative changes are unlikely in North Carolina, and instead has attempted to reconcile existing case law with the original rationale for the planning requirement.