Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Use Of Surveillance Evidence Under Title Iii, Thomas C. Banks
Use Of Surveillance Evidence Under Title Iii, Thomas C. Banks
Vanderbilt Law Review
The rationale offered by Congress for requiring immediate sealing of wiretapping tapes by the court upon the completion of the interception period is to preserve the integrity of the tapes by preventing any tape tampering, alteration, editing, or other governmental bad faith. Congress, however, also added an exception to the sealing requirement that permits disclosure of the tapes' contents in a judicial proceeding if the government has contravened the sealing requirement yet has offered a satisfactory explanation for either a failure to seal or a delay in sealing. No circuit court treats sealing requirement violations in a manner that effects …
The Constitutionality Of The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Of 1978, Judith B. Anderson
The Constitutionality Of The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Of 1978, Judith B. Anderson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Within its more limited scope, the Belfield decision provides a helpful approach to FISA cases by articulating both a solid rationale for FISA's in camera, ex parte provision and a workable balancing approach for determining whether open proceedings may be necessary. The Falvey decision, although broader in scope, does not provide a satisfactory rationale for FISA's deviation from the traditional fourth amendment warrant requirement, nor does it articulate a workable approach to evaluating a FISA-warranted surveillance. The Falvey court, by predicating its upholding of FISA on an acceptance of the national security exception, may perpetuate a debate that the statute …
The Interest In Limiting The Disclosure Of Personal Information: A Constitutional Analysis, Heyward C. Hosch Iii
The Interest In Limiting The Disclosure Of Personal Information: A Constitutional Analysis, Heyward C. Hosch Iii
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note examines possible constitutional protections for the individual interest in restricting a government agency's dissemination of legitimately compiled personal information to the purpose for which it was originally obtained. Part II of this Note defines the substantive interest that underlies the individual's desire to limit disclosure of information about himself by the government. Part III examines Congress' response to the growing public concern for individual control of personal information and concludes that legislative action has been and likely will continue to be inadequate protection for the individual's interest in limited disclosure. The next part discusses the possible textual sources …