Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (3)
- Abortion (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Communications (1)
- Communications; data; surveillance (1)
-
- Comparative constitutional law (1)
- Criminal history (1)
- Criminal history report (1)
- Criminal record (1)
- Criminal records database (1)
- Deference (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Federal Banking Regulation; Privacy Policies; Attorney-Client Privilege (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (1)
- Internet (1)
- Privacy Policies; Natural Language Processing; Automated Processing; Notice and Choice (1)
- Privacy; reasonable expectation of privacy; surveillance; U.S. v. Jones; Kyllo v. U.S.; public significance (1)
- Reproductive justice (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Takings clause (1)
- Technology (1)
- Women's rights (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
A World Without Roe: The Constitutional Future Of Unwanted Pregnancy, Julie Suk
A World Without Roe: The Constitutional Future Of Unwanted Pregnancy, Julie Suk
Faculty Scholarship
With the demise of Roe v. Wade, the survival of abortion access in America will depend on new legal paths. In the same moment that Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has constrained access to abortion in the United States, other constitutional democracies have moved in the opposite direction, expanding access to safe, legal, and free abortions. They have done so without reasoning from Roe’s vision of the private zone of unwanted pregnancy. The development of abortion law outside the United States provides critical insights that can inform future efforts to vindicate the constitutional rights of women facing unwanted pregnancies. …
Disagreeable Privacy Policies: Mismatches Between Meaning And Users’ Understanding, Joel R. Reidenberg, Travis Breaux, Lorrie F. Cranor, Brian M. French, Amanda Grannis, James T. Graves, Fei Liu, Aleecia Mcdonald, Thomas B. Norton, Rohan Ramanath, N. Cameron Russell, Norman Sadeh, Florian Schaub
Disagreeable Privacy Policies: Mismatches Between Meaning And Users’ Understanding, Joel R. Reidenberg, Travis Breaux, Lorrie F. Cranor, Brian M. French, Amanda Grannis, James T. Graves, Fei Liu, Aleecia Mcdonald, Thomas B. Norton, Rohan Ramanath, N. Cameron Russell, Norman Sadeh, Florian Schaub
Faculty Scholarship
Privacy policies are verbose, difficult to understand, take too long to read, and may be the least-read items on most websites even as users express growing concerns about information collection practices. For all their faults, though, privacy policies remain the single most important source of information for users to attempt to learn how companies collect, use, and share data. Likewise, these policies form the basis for the self-regulatory notice and choice framework that is designed and promoted as a replacement for regulation. The underlying value and legitimacy of notice and choice depends, however, on the ability of users to understand …
The Data Surveillance State In Europe And The United States, Joel R. Reidenberg
The Data Surveillance State In Europe And The United States, Joel R. Reidenberg
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Failing Expectations: Fourth Amendment Doctrine In The Era Of Total Surveillance, Olivier Sylvain
Failing Expectations: Fourth Amendment Doctrine In The Era Of Total Surveillance, Olivier Sylvain
Faculty Scholarship
Today’s reasonable expectation test and the third-party doctrine have little to nothing to offer by way of privacy protection if users today are at least conflicted about whether transactional noncontent data should be shared with third parties, including law enforcement officials. This uncertainty about how to define public expectation as a descriptive matter has compelled courts to defer to legislatures to find out what public expectation ought to be more as a matter of prudence than doctrine. Courts and others presume that legislatures are far better than courts at defining public expectations about emergent technologies.This Essay argues that the reasonable …
Beyond Title Vii: Rethinking Race, Ex-Offender Status, And Employment Discrimination In The Information Age, Kimani Paul-Emile
Beyond Title Vii: Rethinking Race, Ex-Offender Status, And Employment Discrimination In The Information Age, Kimani Paul-Emile
Faculty Scholarship
More than sixty-five million people in the United States—more than one in four adults—have had some involvement with the criminal justice system that will appear on a criminal history report. A rapidly expanding, for-profit industry has developed to collect these records and compile them into electronic databases, offering employers an inexpensive and readily accessible means of screening prospective employees. Nine out of ten employers now inquire into the criminal history of job candidates, systematically denying individuals with a criminal record any opportunity to gain work experience or build their job qualifications. This is so despite the fact that many individuals …
Privacy In Public, Joel R. Reidenberg
Privacy In Public, Joel R. Reidenberg
Faculty Scholarship
As government and private companies rapidly expand the infrastructure of surveillance from cameras on every street corner to facial recognition for photographs on social media sites, privacy doctrines built on seclusion are at odds with technological advances. This essay addresses a key conceptual problem in US privacy law identified by Justice Sotomayor in U.S. v. Jones and by Justice Scalia in Kyllo v. U.S.; namely that technological capabilities undermine the meaning of the third-party doctrine and the 4th Amendment's ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ standard. The essay argues that the conceptual problem derives from the evolution of three stages of development …
The Attorney-Client Privilege – Selective Compulsion, Selective Waiver And Selective Disclosure: Is Bank Regulation Exceptional?, Bruce A. Green
The Attorney-Client Privilege – Selective Compulsion, Selective Waiver And Selective Disclosure: Is Bank Regulation Exceptional?, Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
This essay examines three ways in which bank regulation has spawned significant exceptions to the ordinary judicial and administrative understanding of the attorney-client privilege. First, federal banking agencies assert that they have the legal authority selectively to compel banks and other financial institutions they supervise to disclose attorney-client privileged information. Second, when banks disclose privileged material to bank regulators, even if voluntarily, banks retain the privilege with respect to third parties pursuant to specific federal statutory authority. Third, under agency policy, once bank regulators obtain privileged information from a bank, whether through compulsion or voluntarily, the regulators reserve the right …