Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Separation of powers (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- Agency reports (1)
- Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMF) (1)
- Chevron (1)
-
- Civic engagement (1)
- Congressional checks (1)
- Congressional oversight (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Government information (1)
- Governmental funding (1)
- Governmental policymaking (1)
- History (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Laws (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Legislative power (1)
- Major questions doctrine (1)
- Oversight (1)
- Political checks (1)
- Political science (1)
- Public administration (1)
- Publication participation in government (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Substantive canons (1)
- War Powers Resolution (1)
- War powers (1)
- West virginia v. epa (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Searching Govinfo.Gov/, Bert Chapman
Searching Govinfo.Gov/, Bert Chapman
Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations
This U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) database provides access to information legal, legislative, and regulatory information produced on multiple subjects by the U.S. Government. Content includes congressional bills, congressional committee hearings and prints (studies), reports on legislation, the text of laws, regulations, and executive orders and multiple U.S. Government information resources covering subjects from accounting to zoology.
The Major Questions Doctrine At The Boundaries Of Interpretive Law, Daniel E. Walters
The Major Questions Doctrine At The Boundaries Of Interpretive Law, Daniel E. Walters
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s apparent transformation of the major questions doctrine into a clear statement rule demanding clear congressional authorization for “major” agency actions has already had, and will continue to have, wide-ranging impacts on American public law. Not the least of these is the impact it will have on the enterprise of statutory interpretation. Indeed, while it is easy to focus on the policy repercussions of a newly constrained Congress and newly hamstrung administrative state, this Article argues that equally important is the novel precedent that is set in this particular formulation of a clear statement rule, which stands almost …
War Powers Reform: A Skeptical View, Matthew C. Waxman
War Powers Reform: A Skeptical View, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Debates about war powers focus too much on legal checks and on the President’s power to start wars. Congressional checks before and during crises work better than many reform-ists suppose, and there are ways to improve Congress’s political checking without substantial legal reform.