Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- African American (1)
- Dred Scott (1)
- Espionage Act of 1917 (1)
- Free state (1)
- Freedom (1)
-
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Government whistle-blowing (1)
- Henry Kissinger (1)
- Law (1)
- NYT (1)
- New York Times (1)
- New York Times v. U.S. (1)
- Pentagon Papers (1)
- Political scandal (1)
- Property (1)
- Richard Nixon (1)
- Robert McNamara (1)
- Roger B. Taney (1)
- Sandford (1)
- Slave (1)
- Slave state (1)
- Slavery (1)
- US Supreme Court (1)
- Vietnam War (1)
- Washington Post (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
'Dred Scott V. Sandford' Analysis, Sarah E. Roessler
'Dred Scott V. Sandford' Analysis, Sarah E. Roessler
Student Publications
The Scott v. Sandford decision will forever be known as a dark moment in America's history. The Supreme Court chose to rule on a controversial issue, and they made the wrong decision. Scott v. Sandford is an example of what can happen when the Court chooses to side with personal opinion instead of what is right.
New York Times V. U.S.: Implications And Relevance In The 21st Century, Maria E. Lombardi
New York Times V. U.S.: Implications And Relevance In The 21st Century, Maria E. Lombardi
Student Publications
In 1971, the New York Times released the first installment in a series later referred to as the Pentagon Papers that would eventually have significant political, social, and historical impacts that are felt even in the 21st Century. Following the first release, President Nixon’s administration sought an injunction against the publication of the remaining contents of the classified study, ultimately becoming an extensive legal process that culminated in the Supreme Court. In a per curiam opinion, the Court ruled that in accordance with Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe and Near v. Minnesota that the federal government did not …