Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Academic Calendars (1)
- Academic Regulations (1)
- Administration (1)
- Admission (1)
- Application Information (1)
-
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Board of Trustees (1)
- Campus Map (1)
- Clinical Programs (1)
- Curriculum (1)
- Directory (1)
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. (1)
- Elective Courses (1)
- Faculty (1)
- Financial Affairs (1)
- Financial Aid (1)
- First-year Courses (1)
- Georgia v. McCollum (1)
- Hernandez v. New York (1)
- Information Services (1)
- J.E.B. (1)
- J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B. (1)
- Magellan Research (1)
- People v. Carter (1)
- People v. Jamison (1)
- Purkett v. Elem (1)
- Required Upper-Level Courses (1)
- Rick Tabish (1)
- Sandy Murphy (1)
- Schering Corp. v. Pfizer Inc (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Museletter: September 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: September 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
Resarching the Constitution by Caroline Osborne
Library News
But What If We Don't Have It?: Making Interlibrary Loan Requests by Gail Zwirner, Head of Access Services
Computer Tips by Kimberly Wiseman
Museletter: August 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: August 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
Welcome New and Returning Students by Timothy L. Coggins
What You See is Not All You Get! By Sally Wambold
Got Questions? Bring 'em on! By John R. Barden
Greetings from the Law Library's Access Services Department by Gail Zwirner
Richmond Law Magazine: Summer 2006
Richmond Law Magazine: Summer 2006
Richmond Law Magazine
Features:
Righting Wrongs
Family Values
Blogs
The Mediators
Museletter: April 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: April 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
Ten Tips for a Successful Summer by Gail Zwirner and Caroline Osborne
Law at the Movies: 16 Blocks
2006 Summer Project
Carrel Information
[Summer 2006 Hours]
Museletter: March 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: March 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
Challenging Library Materials -- Community or Individual Decisions? by Timothy Coggins
Bridging the Gap at the University of Richmond by Joyce Manna Janto
Museletter: February 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: February 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
What's in an Old Lawyer's Attic? by John Barden
Pro Se / praw siy, pro say / A non-lawyer representing oneself in court without retaining a lawyer.
Citation Questions?
Appendix A To Marvin L. Longabaugh, The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
This Comment will argue that jury nullification is not only a power enjoyed by juries throughout America, but a duty conferred on jurors, and a part of the criminal justice system that should be embraced, not hidden from sight. Part I will highlight the historical origins and justifications of jury nullification. It will also discuss jury nullification in its contemporary context. Part II will address some of the criticisms of jury nullification and provide responses to those criticisms. Finally, Part III will propose a framework for integrating jury nullification into the regular criminal justice process.
Museletter: January 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter: January 2006, Caroline L. Osborne
Museletter
This Issue:
Sit Where You Please: Challenges to Virginia's Segregated Seating Laws by John Barden
Fall Exams -- Law Library Open 24-Hours by Timothy Coggins
[Spring 2006 Hours]
University Of Richmond Bulletin: Catalog Of The T.C. Williams School Of Law For 2006-2008, University Of Richmond
University Of Richmond Bulletin: Catalog Of The T.C. Williams School Of Law For 2006-2008, University Of Richmond
Law School Catalogues
Method of Instruction
The educational program of the law school is designed to equip its graduates to render the highest quality of legal services, while instilling a sense of professional responsibility. Students are trained in the analysis and solution of legal problems by the application of logical reasoning. The course of study is not designed to teach legal rules, but rather to provide a foundation for the application and analysis of the law and the development of professional skills. The traditional case method of instruction is used in many courses. However, clinical education and courses devoted to various professional skills …
Richmond Law Magazine: Winter 2006
Richmond Law Magazine: Winter 2006
Richmond Law Magazine
Features:
How Judges Judge
Balkans in the Balance
Varied Vocations
Proud History, Bright Future
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In June 1999, Sandy Murphy and Rick Tabish were arrested and charged with murder, robbery, burglary, and grand larceny related to the death of Las Vegas casino mogul Lonnie “Ted” Binion. The subsequent trial provided a captivated public with the elements of murder, greed, betrayal, torture, and extortion
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Civil Disobedience In The Jury Room: Give Juries The Right To Go With Their Power, Robert J. Gallaghe
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
This Comment will argue that jury nullification is not only a power enjoyed by juries throughout America, but a duty conferred on jurors, and a part of the criminal justice system that should be embraced, not hidden from sight. Part I will highlight the historical origins and justifications of jury nullification. It will also discuss jury nullification in its contemporary context. Part II will address some of the criticisms of jury nullification and provide responses to those criticisms. Finally, Part III will propose a framework for integrating jury nullification into the regular criminal justice process.