Law Commons^™

Comparative Interpretation: Authentic Study

UAEU Law Journal

This paper deals with the "Comparative Interpretation "from linguistically and terminological point of view, and to explain its beginnings, stages, origins, rules and fields, that are represented in its divisions, and then to determine its scientific path to recognize the objectives of this kind of interpretation particularly its benefits and goals.

Dr Eid Ahmad Al Husban Assistant Professor, Public Law, Legal Studies Department, College Of Islamic Jurisprudence,Al Al-Bayt University. Mafraq, Jordan Research Abstract Due To The Significance Of This Subject, And Due To Its Marginal Status In The Arabic Systems Compared To Its Central Status In The Western Constitutional Systems, This Study Sheds Light On Its Constitutional Characteristics Including Its Nature And System In Order To Ingrain It In The Arab Constitutional Mind. A Critical Analytical Study In The Interpretation Of Scholars For The Hadith Of Imams From Quraish, Odeh Abdullah

UAEU Law Journal

A critical examination of the interpretation of scholars for Hadith of the Prophet Mohammed –peace be upon him- “Imams from Quraish” (Leaders hi in Quraish), reveals that a change has occurred in the understanding of the Hadith and its implications. In the past, Quraish was powerful among the tribes and Imama (leadership) was appropriate for them because people used to follow them and to be loyal to them. However, this status began to fade and people no longer followed Quraish as before. Consequently, as the status of Quraish has shaken, the concept of the Hadith started to change in the …

The Impact Of Different Readings Of Interpretation, Adnan Abdul Razzaq Al Hamwi Al Oulabi

UAEU Law Journal

Differences in recitations of the Holy Quran are one of Islamic legislation’s valuable treasures. These different faces of recitation contain meanings and indications of immense legislative value in the areas of Quranic explanation, language, and regulations.

The differences go beyond ordering the Prophet (Peace be Upon Him) to recite the seven recitations of the Holy Quran accurately to actual understanding and analysis which leads to enlightenment and conclusion drawing on what these differences mean. This also leads to searching for the effects of these recitations.

The Holy Quran remains miraculous in the broadest sense of the word keeping its miracle …

Contemporary Soviet Criminal Law: An Analysis Of The General Principles And Major Institutions Of Post-1958 Soviet Criminal Law, Chris Osakwe

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Interpretation And Construction In Altering Rules, Gregory Klass

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This essay is a response to Ian Ayres's, "Regulating Opt-Out: An Economic Theory of Altering Rules," 121 Yale L.J. 2032 (2012). Ayres identifies an important question: How does the law decide when parties have opted-out of a contractual default? Unfortunately, his article tells only half of the story about such altering rules. Ayres cares about rules designed to instruct parties on how to get the terms that they want. By focusing on such rules he ignores altering rules designed instead to interpret the nonlegal meaning of the parties' acts or agreement. This limited vision is characteristic of economic approaches to …

Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

Recent case developments in Insurance law in the year 1998.

On Parol: The Construction And Interpretation Of Written Agreements And The Role Of Extrinsic Evidence In Contract Litigation, Keith A. Rowley

Scholarly Works

As a general rule, extrinsic evidence, whether written or oral, is not admissible to prove either the intent of the parties to a contract or the meaning of contractual terms when the parties have executed an unambiguous, fully-integrated (i.e., final and all-inclusive) written agreement. The trial court may consider various types of extrinsic evidence, however, in determining whether a particular agreement is fully integrated or ambiguous, and even in choosing among rival interpretations of an agreement where ambiguity is not present. If the trial court determines that an agreement is not fully integrated, then the trier of fact may consider …