Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Apology (1)
-
- Apology in mediation (1)
- Business (1)
- Celotex (1)
- Celotex trilogy (1)
- Cloning (1)
- Computers (1)
- Congress (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminals (1)
- Culture (1)
- DNA (1)
- Electric power (1)
- Electricity market (1)
- Electricity transmission (1)
- FERC (1)
- Fair use (1)
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1)
- Federal Power Act (1)
- Genetic discrimination (1)
- Genetic predisposition (1)
- Human Genome Project (1)
- Iceland (1)
- In vitro fertilization (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Puzzle Of Ivf, Dena S. Davis
The Puzzle Of Ivf, Dena S. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This essay seeks to address a puzzling element of the current political and legal struggles over abortion in the United States: if, as pro-life activists insist, embryos are morally equivalent to born, living persons, then why do these activists not oppose in vitro fertilization (IVF) as aggressively as they oppose abortion? IVF accounts for a significant number of destroyed embryos. Constitutionally, IVF appears to be a much more vulnerable target than abortion. And yet, legislative and political attempts to attack and restrict IVF are few, while attempts to erode women's capability to terminate pregnancies are a constant feature of our …
Stem Cells, Cloning, And Abortion: Making Careful Distinctions, Dena S. Davis
Stem Cells, Cloning, And Abortion: Making Careful Distinctions, Dena S. Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The current controversy over federal funding for research involving stem cells derived from very early embryos is situated between two other equally difficult issues: abortion and cloning. As Laurie Zoloth (2002) says, talk about stem cells is "directly proximate" to the abortion debate. Nonetheless, a settled position in favor of abortion rights does not necessarily lead to support for research that involves the death of embryos. Nor should opposition to reproductive cloning necessarily entail opposition to therapeutic cloning. There are important ways in which our attitudes toward research with embryonic stem cells ought to be entwined with our thinking about …
Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission , Cassandra Burke Robertson
Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission , Cassandra Burke Robertson
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper provides a framework for understanding the current controversy regarding jurisdiction over the power grid, and provides policy-oriented solutions to ensure an adequate, low-cost transmission supply. The main thesis of this paper is that sound transmission policy requires greater federal power, and that Congress is better equipped than the courts to enact such policy. To this end, Part I of the paper offers an historical outline of the problem and analyzes the statutes and regulations that form the backbone of both the federal and state jurisdictional claims. Part II looks at legal considerations regarding the scope of federal jurisdiction. …
Learning From Japan: The Case For Increased Use Of Apology In Mediation , Max Bolstad
Learning From Japan: The Case For Increased Use Of Apology In Mediation , Max Bolstad
Cleveland State Law Review
This article proposes that there is room for increased use of apology in the United States and in mediation in particular. Mediation offers the ideal setting for the offering of an apology because of its position outside the traditional strictures of the adversarial system and because of its oft-stated goal of reconciling parties and preserving relationships. Similarly, an increased awareness of apology among mediators is likely to provide another innovative method for helping parties reach a mutually satisfying and beneficial settlement. Part II of this Article examines the nature of apology and its transformative power. Part II discusses the use …
Identification Of The Unknown Soldier And The Fight For The Right To Anonymity: The Human Genome Project And Implications Of A National Dna Database, Kelly S. Erbes
Cleveland State Law Review
The focus of this writing is the use of DNA for identification purposes and the issues that arise when genetic traits and/or predisposition to physical or mental conditions are linked to the individual specifically, along with the implications of a national DNA database as a system of identification. It has become the general rule that it is not an unreasonable invasion of privacy to take DNA for the purpose of identifying criminal offenders through a DNA database. This writing will examine the potential for nonconsensual inclusion of nearly everyone into such a system, as well as the ramifications in the …
Year 2000 Hurdles And Controversies, Michael D. Schindler
Year 2000 Hurdles And Controversies, Michael D. Schindler
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the hurdles and controversies of the Year 2000 problem. First, some background on the "Millennium Bug" explains the nature of the problem, how to fix it, and what it will cost. Next, the article discusses recent Year 2000 litigation. Then the article suggests that companies should implement a legal strategy to avoid potential liability by performing a legal audit of the Year 2000 problem. Additionally, the UCC and case law analysis are used to explain possible causes of action and who the plaintiffs and defendants will be. Other key legal issues analyzed are SEC disclosure requirements, insurance …
Summary Judgment And Problems In Applying The Celotex Trilogy Standard, Gregory A. Gordillo
Summary Judgment And Problems In Applying The Celotex Trilogy Standard, Gregory A. Gordillo
Cleveland State Law Review
In this Note, the difficulties judges encounter in applying the Celotex standards are illustrated through an examination of summary judgment decisions in the United States Supreme Court and in Ohio courts. Ohio's judges often look to the Supreme Court's interpretations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for guidance in applying Ohio's summary judgment rule, and summary judgment decisions of this state therefore exemplify the pitfalls that the Supreme Court has created.