Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (20)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (20)
- Ohio (18)
- State law; State administrative decision; (18)
- Inc. (6)
-
- Student comment (5)
- Fifth Amendment (3)
- Texas Supreme Court (3)
- Articles, Monographs, and Outlines (2)
- Attorney’s fees (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Exemplary damages (2)
- Expert testimony (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Legal malpractice (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Professional responsibility (2)
- Property rights (2)
- Public benefit (2)
- Public use (2)
- 1 U.S.C. § 1 (1)
- 2003 amendment (1)
- 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)-(c) (1)
- 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4)(A) (1)
- 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (1)
- 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a) (1)
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)-(c) (1)
- 76.201 (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0751: Century Well Services V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order2005-41
Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0752: Randy D. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-47
Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0746: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10
Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0747: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10
Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0748: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10
Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0743: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)
Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0745: Georgiana Oil Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2005-07, 2005-08, 2005-09, and 2005-10
Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0749: Eastland Energy Group V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2004-104 and 2004-104 (corrected)
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Rise Of The Cartel: The Creation And Effects Of A New Gas Opec, Monika Ehrman
Rise Of The Cartel: The Creation And Effects Of A New Gas Opec, Monika Ehrman
Monika U. Ehrman
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0744: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-100
Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0732: Waterloo Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-32
Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0734: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-29
Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0740: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55
Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0737: Gemini Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-38
Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0739: Francis Smith, Dba Ridgeway Resources V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-27 and Chief's Order 2004-55
Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0717: Stonebridge Operating Co., Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2003-37
Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0735: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-37
Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0736: Energy Development Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-42
Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0741: Chieftain Energy Corp. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-49
The Bolivian Referendum And Its Implications For The Gas Market, Diego Fernando Rojas
The Bolivian Referendum And Its Implications For The Gas Market, Diego Fernando Rojas
Diego F. Rojas
No abstract provided.
Ethics In The Oil Patch: Who Is The Client And What Difference Does It Make?, John C. Everett
Ethics In The Oil Patch: Who Is The Client And What Difference Does It Make?, John C. Everett
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Technical & Legal Considerations In Implementing An Exploration And Development Plan Or What Do We Do Now?, Robert M. Mcgowen, Robert M. Honea
Technical & Legal Considerations In Implementing An Exploration And Development Plan Or What Do We Do Now?, Robert M. Mcgowen, Robert M. Honea
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Yours, Mine, And Ours: Documenting The Exploration Venture, Mark Boiling
Yours, Mine, And Ours: Documenting The Exploration Venture, Mark Boiling
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Oil & Gas Litigation: What Usually Goes Wrong And What Can Be Done To Prevent It, Ed Norwood
Oil & Gas Litigation: What Usually Goes Wrong And What Can Be Done To Prevent It, Ed Norwood
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In Natural Resoures Law - Circa 2005, Thomas A. Daily
Recent Developments In Natural Resoures Law - Circa 2005, Thomas A. Daily
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Plan To Allow Retrieval Of Alaskan Oil Could Upend Decades Of Precedent, Shauna Coleman
Plan To Allow Retrieval Of Alaskan Oil Could Upend Decades Of Precedent, Shauna Coleman
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance In Extractive Industries, Matthew Nick
Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance In Extractive Industries, Matthew Nick
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The oil and natural gas reserves under the Caspian Sea have sparked the interest of international investors and oil firms. The political, economic, and social turmoil in the five countries bordering the Caspian Sea, however, pose significant challenges for effective regulation of multinational interaction with the five Caspian states. A joint-effort approach to regulation involving the World Bank, multinational enterprises, and the individual Caspian states' governments poses the most functional and efficient means of instituting international oversight. Such a tripartite structure connects the fortunes of all the parties and provides safeguards against default by any single entity. A mutually beneficial …
Qui Tam: Survival Of The Action And Fate Of The Proceeds Following The Death Of The Relator For The King And For Himself ... And His Heirs., Joseph E. Hoffer
Qui Tam: Survival Of The Action And Fate Of The Proceeds Following The Death Of The Relator For The King And For Himself ... And His Heirs., Joseph E. Hoffer
St. Mary's Law Journal
In the market economy of the United States, a large segment of industry is focused on providing goods and services to the government or to the public on behalf of the government. Often, small businesses are preferred to multinational corporations. But, when the actions of a business toward the government involve the myriad methods of deceit and inflating costs and billing, the business’s legitimate actions have turned into fraud against the government. For those employees who witness this fraudulent behavior and wish to act, one option is to file a qui tam action. The action may be brought either by …
Sand Wars: Mineral Reservation Policies Lead The Supreme Court To Determine Whether Sand Is A Valuable Mineral In The Nevada Desert, James L. Ryan
Sand Wars: Mineral Reservation Policies Lead The Supreme Court To Determine Whether Sand Is A Valuable Mineral In The Nevada Desert, James L. Ryan
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.