Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Executive power (2)
- Terrorism (2)
- AWS (1)
- Air power (1)
- Air warfare (1)
-
- Article 36 (1)
- Automation (1)
- Autonomous weapon systems (1)
- Bivens (1)
- CCW (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Constitutional history (1)
- Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (1)
- Counterinsurgency (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Critical race theory (1)
- Declare war (1)
- Derrick Bell (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- Drones (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Human Rights Watch (1)
- Insurgency (1)
- Intelligence gathering (1)
- Interest convergence (1)
- International Law Studies (1)
- International Law Studies Series U.S. Naval War College (1)
- International law (1)
- Judicial review (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cyber Sovereignty: The Way Ahead, Eric Talbot Jensen
Cyber Sovereignty: The Way Ahead, Eric Talbot Jensen
Faculty Scholarship
The last few years are full of reports of cyber incidents, some of which have caused significant damage. Each of these cyber events raise important questions about the role and responsibility of States with respect to cyber incidents. The answer to these questions revolves in large part around the international law doctrine of sovereignty. The extent to which nations exercise sovereignty over cyberspace and cyber infrastructure will provide key answers to how much control States must exercise and how much responsibility States must accept for harmful cyber activities when they fail to adequately do so. This article argues that States …
Country Report On Counterterrorism: United States Of America, Sudha Setty
Country Report On Counterterrorism: United States Of America, Sudha Setty
Faculty Scholarship
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, led to profound changes in societal viewpoints, political agendas, and the legal authorization to combat terrorism. The United States continues to struggle with keeping its population safe while maintaining the principles of democracy and the rule of law essential to the nation’s character. The U.S. response to terrorism has been multifaceted and expansive, reflective of the U.S. role in global security; debate over these matters will continue for the foreseeable future.
This report, prepared for the American Society of Comparative Law, offers summary, analysis and critique of many aspects of counterterrorism law, including …
Targeted Killings And The Interest Convergence Dilemma, Sudha Setty
Targeted Killings And The Interest Convergence Dilemma, Sudha Setty
Faculty Scholarship
In the 1980s, Professor Derrick Bell posited a theory of interest convergence as part of his critical race theory work, arguing that the major strides forward in civil rights law and policy that benefited African Americans in the 1950s and 1960s only occurred because of the perceived benefits of those changes to white elites during that time. In Bell’s view, it was only at the point at which the interests of powerful whites converged with those of marginalized racial minorities that significant changes in civil rights law could occur.
Twelve years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, numerous …
Still Shortchanged: Some Observations About The New Army/Marine Corps Coin Doctrine, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Still Shortchanged: Some Observations About The New Army/Marine Corps Coin Doctrine, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews: War & Technology, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Book Reviews: War & Technology, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The National Security State: The End Of Separation Of Powers, Michael E. Tigar
The National Security State: The End Of Separation Of Powers, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Are Damages Different? Bivens And National Security, Andrew Kent
Are Damages Different? Bivens And National Security, Andrew Kent
Faculty Scholarship
Litigation challenging the national security actions of the federal government has taken a seemingly paradoxical form in recent years. Prospective coercive remedies like injunctions and habeas corpus (a kind of injunction) are traditionally understood to involve much greater intrusions by the judiciary into government functioning than retrospective money damages awards. Yet federal courts have developed and strictly applied doctrines barring Bivens damages actions against federal officials because of an asserted need to preserve the prerogatives of the political branches in national security and foreign affairs. At the same time, the courts have been increasingly assertive in cases involving coercive remedies, …
Adapting The Law Of Armed Conflict To Autonomous Weapon Systems, Kenneth Anderson, Daniel Reisner, Matthew C. Waxman
Adapting The Law Of Armed Conflict To Autonomous Weapon Systems, Kenneth Anderson, Daniel Reisner, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Weapon systems are becoming increasingly automated and arguably some autonomous military systems have been deployed for years. Recent advances in automated systems and the possibilities they portend have generated interest and anxiety within some militaries and defense ministries, and a movement of non-governmental activists seeking to ban fully autonomous weapons. In May 2014, the High Contracting Parties of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) convened an extensive discussion of the legal and ethical issues that autonomous weapons raise, while recognizing that many of these problems lie at an uncertain point in the future.
It is important that normative …
The Power To Threaten War, Matthew C. Waxman
The Power To Threaten War, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Existing war powers scholarship focuses overwhelmingly on the President's power to initiate military operations abroad and the extent to which that power is constrained by Congress. It ignores the allocation of legal power to threaten military force or war, even though threats – to coerce or deter enemies and to reassure allies – are one of the most important ways in which the United States government wields its military might. This paper fills that scholarly void, and draws on recent political science and historical scholarship to construct a richer and more accurate account of the modern presidency's powers to shape …