Law Commons^™

Crafting Military Commissions Post-Hamdan: The Military Commissions Act Of 2006, Douglas A. Hass

Indiana Law Journal

In June 2006, the Supreme Court invalidated President Bush's military commission rules in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The Court held that the military commissions fell outside of the military court system established by Congress, and ruled the commissions unconstitutional as applied to both citizens and non-citizens. Congress responded with the Military Commissions Act of 2006 ("the Act"), new legislation to establish military commissions. The Act fails to balance properly the Court's fairness requirements with the extraordinary demands placed on the laws of war by terrorism.

This Note summarizes whether terrorist attacks implicate the laws of war, what protections are due parties …

International Law And Constitutional Interpretation: The Commander In Chief Clause Reconsidered, Ingrid Brunk Wuerth

Michigan Law Review

The Commander in Chief Clause is a difficult, underexplored area of constitutional interpretation. It is also a context in which international law is often mentioned, but not fully defended, as a possible method of interpreting the Constitution. This Article analyzes why the Commander in Chief Clause is difficult and argues that international law helps resolve some of the problems that the Clause presents. Because of weaknesses in originalist analysis, changes over time, and lack of judicial competence in military matters, the Court and commentators have relied on second-order interpretive norms like congressional authorization and executive branch practice in interpreting the …

Ten Questions: Responses Of John S. Baker, Jr., John S. Baker Jr.

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ten Questions: Responses Of Lisa Graves, Lisa Graves

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ten Questions: Responses Of Robert F. Turner, Robert F. Turner

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is The Geneva Pow Convention "Quaint"?, R. J. Delahunty

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Paper Tiger With Bite: A Defense Of The War Powers Resolution, Michael B. Weiner

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The War Powers Resolution (WPR) has led a beleaguered existence. Since its enactment in 1973, it has been labeled ineffectual and useless. This Note proves, however, that to review presidential unilateral uses of force since 1973 is to find a spirit of compliance with the WPR, as these uses of force have been characterized by their brevity and their lack of spilled U.S.blood. While minor departures from the WPR's black-letter requirements are conceded, none of these uses of force have developed into, or even resembled, Vietnam-esque quagmires. As a result, this Note contends that the WPR has had a positive …

Ten Questions: Responses Of John Cary Sims, John Cary Sims

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

This Call May Be Monitored: Is Nsa Wiretapping Legal?

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Balance Of Power: The Supreme Court's Decision On Military Commissions And The Competing Interests In The War On Terror, Josiah Ramsey Fricton

William Mitchell Law Review

No abstract provided.