Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Afghanistan (1)
- Afghanistan conflict (1)
- Armed conflict (1)
- Battlefield combat (1)
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law (1)
-
- Combatant detention (1)
- Conventions of war (1)
- Courtroom justice (1)
- Detainee Treatment Act (1)
- Detention operation (1)
- Detention standard (1)
- District courts (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Humanitarian law (1)
- International Law Studies (1)
- International Law Studies Series U.S. Naval War College (1)
- International law (1)
- Israel Yearbook on Human Rights (1)
- Just war theory (1)
- Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) (1)
- Problem of justice (1)
- Proof and evidence standard (1)
- Rationale of war (1)
- Self-defense (1)
- State of war (1)
- Taliban (1)
- Washburn Law Journal (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States Detention Operations In Afghanistan And The Law Of Armed Conflict, Matthew C. Waxman
United States Detention Operations In Afghanistan And The Law Of Armed Conflict, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Looking back on US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan to date, three key issues stand out: one substantive, one procedural and one policy. The substantive matter – what are the minimum baseline treatment standards required as a matter of international law? – has clarified significantly during the course of operations there, largely as a result of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The procedural matter – what adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who may be detained? – eludes consensus and has become more controversial the longer the Afghan conflict continues. And the …
Is Justice Relevant To The Law Of War, George P. Fletcher
Is Justice Relevant To The Law Of War, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Intellectual work on the law of war suffers from chronic isolation. The commentators on the Rome Statute are international lawyers who pay no attention to the work either of theoretical criminal lawyers or of the philosophers. The philosophers – Jeff McMahan as an outstanding example – ignore the legal details that dominate the books of the international lawyers. Criminal lawyers have much to contribute to the discussion of international law, but they seem not to be interested. Writers with limited audiences, living in closed worlds, are unaware of what they have to learn from those with a different take on …
Guantánamo, Habeas Corpus, And Standards Of Proof: Viewing The Law Through Multiple Lenses, Matthew C. Waxman
Guantánamo, Habeas Corpus, And Standards Of Proof: Viewing The Law Through Multiple Lenses, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court held in Boumediene v. Bush that Guantánamo detainees have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review of their detention, but it left to district courts in the first instance responsibility for working through the appropriate standard of proof and related evidentiary principles imposed on the government to justify continued detention. This article argues that embedded in seemingly straightforward judicial standard-setting with respect to proof and evidence are significant policy questions about competing risks and their distribution. How one approaches these questions depends on the lens through which one views the problem: through that of a courtroom concerned …
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues related to the law of armed conflict stand out: one substantive, one procedural and one policy. The substantive matter – what are the minimum baseline treatment standards required as a matter of international law? – has clarified significantly during the course of operations there, largely as a result of the US Supreme Court's holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The procedural matter – what adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who may be detained? – eludes consensus and has become more controversial …