Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Terrorism (2)
- War (2)
- AUMF (1)
- AWS (1)
- Admiralty Law (1)
-
- Article 36 (1)
- Automation (1)
- Autonomous weapon systems (1)
- Business Organizations (1)
- CCW (1)
- Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Executive Department (1)
- Human Rights Watch (1)
- Industry (1)
- Israel (1)
- Killer Robots (1)
- Law Enforcement (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Law of armed conflict (1)
- Legal weapons review (1)
- Lethal autonomous weapon systems (1)
- Military Law (1)
- Military Tribunals (1)
- Military War and Peace (1)
- National security (1)
- No Fly List (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Pre-Crime Restraints: The Explosion Of Targeted, Non-Custodial Prevention, Jennifer Daskal
Pre-Crime Restraints: The Explosion Of Targeted, Non-Custodial Prevention, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This Article exposes the ways in which noncustodial pre-crime restraints have proliferated over the past decade, focusing in particular on three notable examples — terrorism-related financial sanctions, the No Fly List, and the array of residential, employment, and related restrictions imposed on sex offenders. Because such restraints do not involve physical incapacitation, they are rarely deemed to infringe core liberty interests. Because they are preventive, not punitive, criminal law procedural protections do not apply. They have exploded largely unchecked — subject to little more than bare rationality review and negligible procedural protections — and without any coherent theory as to …
After The Aumf, Jennifer Daskal
After The Aumf, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Over a dozen years later, the AUMF — which has never been amended — remains the principal source of the U.S. government’s domestic legal authority to use military force against al Qaeda and its associates, both on the battlefields of Afghanistan and far beyond. But even as the statutory framework has remained unchanged, the facts on the ground have evolved dramatically, leading some to call for a new AUMF. In short, calls for a new framework statute to replace the AUMF are unnecessary, provocative, and counterproductive; they perpetuate war at a time when we should be seeking to end it. …
Adapting The Law Of Armed Conflict To Autonomous Weapon Systems, Kenneth Anderson, Daniel Reisner, Matthew Waxman
Adapting The Law Of Armed Conflict To Autonomous Weapon Systems, Kenneth Anderson, Daniel Reisner, Matthew Waxman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
As increasingly automated – and in some cases fully autonomous – weapon systems enter the battlefield or become possible, it is important that international norms to regulate them head down a path that is coherent and practical. Contrary to the claims of some advocates, autonomous weapon systems are not inherently illegal or unethical. The technologies involved potentially hold promise for making armed conflict more discriminating and causing less harm on the battlefield. They do pose important challenges, however, with regard to law of armed conflict rules regulating the use of weapons. Those challenges demand international attention and special processes for …