Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bush administration (1)
- Capacity (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Counterterrorism court (1)
- Criminal Intent (1)
-
- Extraordinary rendition (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Genocide (1)
- Guantanamo (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Hirota v. MacArthur (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Humanitarian Law (1)
- Idealism (1)
- Interest (1)
- International Military Tribunal for the Far East (1)
- Liberal realism (1)
- Military Law (1)
- Multipolar (1)
- National security court (1)
- Realism (1)
- States (1)
- Superpower (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- US Constitution Article III (1)
- United Nations (1)
- War (1)
- War crimes (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
U.S. Counterterrorism Policy And Superpower Compliance With International Human Rights Norms, Kenneth Anderson
U.S. Counterterrorism Policy And Superpower Compliance With International Human Rights Norms, Kenneth Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This essay, originally prepared for a symposium on Guantanamo and international law, provides an brief overview of the elements that a comprehensive US counterterrorism should encompass. This overview is set against the question of how the US, as the world's superpower, ought to address its international law obligations. The essay then sets that question against the still-further question of what it means to be the superpower in a world that some believe is gradually evolving into a multipolar world, but which is currently a world of a conjoined US-international global system of security.
The essay defends the concept of counterterrorism …
Deconstructing Hirota: Habeas Corpus, Citizenship, And Article Iii, Stephen I. Vladeck
Deconstructing Hirota: Habeas Corpus, Citizenship, And Article Iii, Stephen I. Vladeck
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The jurisdiction of the federal courts to consider habeas petitions brought by detainees held as part of the “war on terrorism” has been a popular topic for courts and commentators alike. Little attention has been paid, however, to whether the Constitution itself interposes any jurisdictional limits over such petitions. In a series of recent cases, the US government has invoked the Supreme Court’s obscure (and obtuse) 1948 decision in Hirota v. MacArthur (338 US 197) for the proposition that Article III forecloses jurisdiction over any petition brought by a detainee in foreign or international custody, including that of the “Multinational …
Remarks On Intervention, Juan E. Mendez
Remarks On Intervention, Juan E. Mendez
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.