Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 9/11 (5)
- September 11 (5)
- Terrorism (5)
- War on terror (5)
- Assassination (4)
-
- Terrorist (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- National security (3)
- Ex parte Quirin (2)
- Military tribunals (2)
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (2)
- Executive (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- Executive order (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Homeland security (1)
- Journalism (1)
- Media (1)
- NPR (1)
- National public radio (1)
- National security law (1)
- President (1)
- Presidential (1)
- R&D (1)
- Reporting on terrorism (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Targeted killing (1)
- Tax (1)
- Tax law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tax Incentives: A Means Of Encouraging Research And Development For Homeland Security?, Jennifer L. Venghaus
Tax Incentives: A Means Of Encouraging Research And Development For Homeland Security?, Jennifer L. Venghaus
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Proposal For A New Executive Order On Assassination, Jeffrey F. Addicott
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Targeted Killing And Assassination: The U.S. Legal Framework, William C. Banks, Peter Raven-Hansen
Targeted Killing And Assassination: The U.S. Legal Framework, William C. Banks, Peter Raven-Hansen
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
It's Not Really "Assassination": Legal And Moral Implications Of Intentionally Targeting Terrorists And Aggressor-State Regime Elites, Robert F. Turner
It's Not Really "Assassination": Legal And Moral Implications Of Intentionally Targeting Terrorists And Aggressor-State Regime Elites, Robert F. Turner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Detentions, Military Commissions, Terrorism And Domestic Case Precedent, Carl W. Tobias
Detentions, Military Commissions, Terrorism And Domestic Case Precedent, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Laura Dickinson's recent article in this journal substantially improves appreciation of how the United States has detained suspects and instituted military commissions as well as of the roles played by the controversial procedure and tribunals when fighting terrorism. She meticulously traces how detentions and the commissions evolved, trenchantly criticizes them, and persuasively shows international tribunals' comparative advantage. Dickinson accords relevant domestic case precedent a somewhat laconic analysis, however. For example, she briefly mentions separation-of-powers concerns and Supreme Court opinions that detentions and military commissions implicate while rather tersely assessing Ex parte Quirin, the Second World War decision on which …
Quirin Revisited, Carl W. Tobias
Quirin Revisited, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Six decades ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Ex parte Quirin, in which the Justices determined that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt possessed the requisite constitutional authority to institute and use a military commission.
On November 13, 2001, President George W. Bush promulgated an Executive Order (Bush Order) that authorized the establishment and application of military commissions as well as purported to eliminate whatever jurisdiction federal courts might have by statute and to deny federal court access to individuals prosecuted or detained for terrorism. The Bush administration substantially premised that the Order and jurisdiction-stripping proviso on Ex parte Quirin. It has …