Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Health care (4)
- Bioethics (3)
- Ethics (3)
- Law (3)
- Medicine (3)
-
- Nursing (3)
- Health (2)
- Alternatives (1)
- Big data (1)
- Black box (1)
- Brain imaging (1)
- Clinical trials (1)
- Cloud computing (1)
- Collectively governed systems (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- HIPPA (1)
- Hatch-Waxman (1)
- Health privacy laws (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Neuroimaging (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- Obamacare (1)
- Patent (1)
- Pharmaceuticals (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Spring 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Spring 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Winter 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Winter 2013
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Neurotechnologies At The Intersection Of Criminal Procedure And Constitutional Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik
Neurotechnologies At The Intersection Of Criminal Procedure And Constitutional Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik
Faculty Scholarship
The rapid development of neurotechnologies poses novel constitutional issues for criminal law and criminal procedure. These technologies can identify directly from brain waves whether a person is familiar with a stimulus like a face or a weapon, can model blood flow in the brain to indicate whether a person is lying, and can even interfere with brain processes themselves via high-powered magnets to cause a person to be less likely to lie to an investigator. These technologies implicate the constitutional privilege against compelled, self-incriminating speech under the Fifth Amendment and the right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure …
The Future Of Hipaa In The Cloud, Frank Pasquale, Tara Adams Ragone
The Future Of Hipaa In The Cloud, Frank Pasquale, Tara Adams Ragone
Faculty Scholarship
This white paper examines how cloud computing generates new privacy challenges for both healthcare providers and patients, and how American health privacy laws may be interpreted or amended to address these challenges. Given the current implementation of Meaningful Use rules for health information technology and the Omnibus HIPAA Rule in health care generally, the stage is now set for a distinctive law of “health information” to emerge. HIPAA has come of age of late, with more aggressive enforcement efforts targeting wayward healthcare providers and entities. Nevertheless, more needs to be done to assure that health privacy and all the values …
Enhancing Communication Between Scientists, Government Officials, And The Lay Public: Advancing Science And Protecting The Public's Welfare Through Better Multi-Stakeholder Interfacing, Clark J. Lee, Patrick P. Rose, Earl Stoddard Iii
Enhancing Communication Between Scientists, Government Officials, And The Lay Public: Advancing Science And Protecting The Public's Welfare Through Better Multi-Stakeholder Interfacing, Clark J. Lee, Patrick P. Rose, Earl Stoddard Iii
Homeland Security Publications
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property And Public Health – A White Paper, Ryan G. Vacca, James Ming Chen, Jay Dratler Jr., Thomas Folsom, Timothy S. Hall, Yaniv Heled, Frank A. Pasquale, Elizabeth A. Reilly, Jeffery Samuels, Katherine J. Strandburg, Kara W. Swanson, Andrew W. Torrance, Katharine A. Van Tassel
Intellectual Property And Public Health – A White Paper, Ryan G. Vacca, James Ming Chen, Jay Dratler Jr., Thomas Folsom, Timothy S. Hall, Yaniv Heled, Frank A. Pasquale, Elizabeth A. Reilly, Jeffery Samuels, Katherine J. Strandburg, Kara W. Swanson, Andrew W. Torrance, Katharine A. Van Tassel
Faculty Scholarship
On October 26, 2012, the University of Akron School of Law’s Center for Intellectual Property and Technology hosted its Sixth Annual IP Scholars Forum. In attendance were thirteen legal scholars with expertise and an interest in IP and public health who met to discuss problems and potential solutions at the intersection of these fields. This report summarizes this discussion by describing the problems raised, areas of agreement and disagreement between the participants, suggestions and solutions made by participants and the subsequent evaluations of these suggestions and solutions. Led by the moderator, participants at the Forum focused generally on three broad …