Law Commons^™

A Job For Congress: Medical Marijuana Patients’ Fight For Second Amendment Rights, Kenneth Seligson

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Note begins with Part I section (A), describing the administrative rule and factual background, leading up to the suit in Wilson v. Lynch. Part I section (B) explains the arguments made at the U.S. District Court in Nevada and how the case progressed from the district court to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Then, Part I section (C) analyzes the Ninth Circuit’s application of the two-step test for Second Amendment challenges established in Chovan.

After evaluating the application of the two-step test in Wilson v. Lynch, Part II section (A) reviews the history of cannabis …

Unnecessary Hysterectomy: The Lack Of Informed Consent, Patricia Quintilian

Golden Gate University Law Review

Women, as well as men, are socialized to believe that the ethics and expertise of the medical community ensure competent behavior on the part of physicians. This belief, however, is misguided; the evidence indicates that women's health care is grossly inadequate and in dire need of effective external control and regulation. The power necessary for such regulation may be found in the judiciary. Several courses are available to the legal practitioner when faced with claims of medical misconduct. But because profit motivation dominates the health field, the reality of malpractice suits and their accompanying awards may act as an effective …

Moral And Legal Issues Concerning Contemporary Human Cloning Technology : Quest For Regulatory Consensus In The International Community To Safeguard Rights And Liberties Essential To The Future Of Humanity, Ching-Pou Shih

Theses and Dissertations

The research topic for this dissertation would focus its efforts on resolving at least two questions as follows: First, what are the major moral and legal problems in current human cloning technology and what are the intelligent choices of public policy? Second, how could respective nations, regions, and the international community corporately clarify those problems in the realm of contemporary human dignity imperative and human rights jurisprudence.

Oversight Hearing On Patient Dumping Of The Medically Indigent - Transcript, Special Committee On Medi-Cal Oversight

California Assembly

No abstract provided.

Oversight Hearing On Patient Dumping Of The Medically Indigent - Written Testimony, Special Committee On Medi-Cal Oversight

California Assembly

No abstract provided.

Medical Malpractice Screening Panels, Assembly Committee On Judiciary

California Assembly

No abstract provided.

Huffman V. Lindquist [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Nonsuits were properly granted to a doctor and hospital in a malpractice and negligence action by the mother of a deceased son where there was insufficient evidence that actions of the doctor and hospital were the proximate cause of the son's death.

Simone V. Sabo [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In a patient's malpractice action against his dentist, there was no expert witness testimony that the dentist rendered improper treatment when he removed the patient's impacted tooth and bruised or severed the mandibular nerve.