Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Civil actions (1)
- Conditions of confinement (1)
- Consumer defendants (1)
-
- Eighth amendment (1)
- Gingles (1)
- Judgment (1)
- Local Government (1)
- Lumping (1)
- Mental illness (1)
- Mentally ill prisoners (1)
- Minority voter (1)
- Prison (1)
- Prison litigation reform act (1)
- Reciprocal (1)
- Residential foreclosure (1)
- Role-reversible (1)
- Shelby County (1)
- Solitary confinement (1)
- VRA (1)
- Vote dilution (1)
- Voter discrimination (1)
- Voting Rights Act (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Shelby County And Local Governments: A Case Study Of Local Texas Governments Diluting Minority Votes, Sydnee Fielkow
Shelby County And Local Governments: A Case Study Of Local Texas Governments Diluting Minority Votes, Sydnee Fielkow
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Why Consumer Defendants Lump It, Emily S. Taylor Poppe
Why Consumer Defendants Lump It, Emily S. Taylor Poppe
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Banning Solitary For Prisoners With Mental Illness: The Blurred Line Between Physical And Psychological Harm, Rosalind Dillon
Banning Solitary For Prisoners With Mental Illness: The Blurred Line Between Physical And Psychological Harm, Rosalind Dillon
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intelligence And Role-Reversible Judgment, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Stephen Henderson
Artificial Intelligence And Role-Reversible Judgment, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Stephen Henderson
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Intelligent machines increasingly outperform human experts, raising the question of when (and why) humans should remain ‘in the loop’ of decision-making. One common answer focuses on outcomes: relying on intuition and experience, humans are capable of identifying interpretive errors—sometimes disastrous errors—that elude machines. Though plausible today, this argument will wear thin as technology evolves.
In this Article, we seek out sturdier ground: a defense of human judgment that focuses on the normative integrity of decision-making. Specifically, we propose an account of democratic equality as ‘role-reversibility.’ In a democracy, those tasked with making decisions should be susceptible, reciprocally, to the impact …