Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bifurcation (1)
- Blum (1)
- Callahan (1)
- Confidential informants (1)
- Consent once removed (1)
-
- Consent to enter (1)
- Consent-once-removed (1)
- Constitutional violations (1)
- Correctional Medical Services (1)
- In-agency agreement (1)
- Inter-governmental agreement (1)
- Karen Blum (1)
- Katz (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Monell Claims (1)
- Municipal liability (1)
- Nelson (1)
- Officially adopted policy (1)
- Pearson (1)
- Pearson v. Callahan (1)
- Promulgated policy (1)
- Saucier (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Two step rule (1)
- Two-step rule (1)
- Undercover police officer (1)
- Warrant (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Making Out The Monell Claim Under Section 1983, Karen M. Blum
Making Out The Monell Claim Under Section 1983, Karen M. Blum
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation: Post-Pearson And Post-Iqbal, Karen M. Blum
Section 1983 Litigation: Post-Pearson And Post-Iqbal, Karen M. Blum
Touro Law Review
The Supreme Court's decision in Pearson v. Callahan marked a significant change in the structure of the analysis to be performedin the adjudication of the qualified immunity defense in§ 1983 litigation. Prior to Pearson, the Court required a mandatory two-step approach for the qualified immunity analysis. Whenever qualified immunity was raised in response to an alleged constitutional violation, the lower courts were instructed that the disposition of the qualified immunity issue required the court to first address the merits question. Under Saucier v. Katz, the courts were required first to decide whether the complaint stated a violation of a constitutional …