Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Champerty (2)
- Access to Justice (1)
- Alternative Litigation Finance (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Barretry (1)
-
- Case management (1)
- Chevron Ecuador (1)
- Civil Litigation (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Clarity (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Discretion (1)
- District court (1)
- Docket (1)
- Economics of litigation (1)
- Empire (1)
- Federal question (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Grable (1)
- Gunn (1)
- Infringement risk (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisdictional (1)
- Landes-Posner-Gould settlement model (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legal Ethics (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Litigation Costs (1)
- Litigation and procedure (1)
- Litigation cost (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Litigation Finance Contract, Maya Steinitz
The Litigation Finance Contract, Maya Steinitz
Faculty Scholarship
Litigation funding-for-profit, nonrecourse funding of a litigation by a nonparty-is a new and rapidly developing industry. It has been described as one of the "biggest and most influential trends in civil justice" today by RAND, the New York Times, and others. Despite the importance and growth of the industry, there is a complete absence of information about or discussion of litigation finance contracting, even though all the promises and pitfalls of litigation funding stem from the relationships those contracts establish and organize. Further, the literature and case law pertaining to litigation funding have evolved from an analogy between litigation funding …
The Private Costs Of Patent Litigation, James Bessen, Michael J. Meurer
The Private Costs Of Patent Litigation, James Bessen, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
This paper estimates the total cost of patent litigation to alleged infringers. We use a large sample of stock market event studies around the date of lawsuit filings for US public firms from 1984-99. We find that the total costs of litigation are much greater than legal fees and costs are large even for lawsuits that settle. Lawsuits cost alleged infringers about $28.7 million ($92) in the mean and $2.9 million in the median. Moreover, infringement risk rose sharply during the late 1990s to over 14% of R&D spending. Small firms have lower risk relative to R&D.
The Economics Of Third-Party Financed Litigation, Keith N. Hylton
The Economics Of Third-Party Financed Litigation, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines the law and economics of third-party financed litigation. I explore the conditions under which a system of third-party financiers and litigators can enhance social welfare, and the conditions under which it is likely to reduce social welfare. Among the applications I consider are the sale of legal rights (such as contingent tort claims) to insurers, to patent trolls, and to financiers generally
Trial Selection Theory And Evidence, Keith N. Hylton, Haizhen Lin
Trial Selection Theory And Evidence, Keith N. Hylton, Haizhen Lin
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter presents a review of trial selection theory. We use the term “trial selection theory” to refer to models that attempt to explain or predict the characteristics that distinguish cases that are litigated to judgment from those that settle, and the implications of those characteristics for the development of legal doctrine and for important trial outcome parameters, such as the plaintiff win rate. Using this definition, trial selection theory can be said to have started with Priest and Klein (1984).
Clarity And Clarification: Grable Federal Questions In The Eyes Of Their Beholders, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Clarity And Clarification: Grable Federal Questions In The Eyes Of Their Beholders, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Faculty Scholarship
Jurists and commentators have repeated for centuries the refrain that jurisdictional rules should be clear.' Behind this mantra is the idea that clearly designed jurisdictional rules should enable trial courts to apply the law more easily and therefore allow litigants to predict more accurately how trial courts will rule.2 The mantra's ultimate goal is efficiency-that trial courts not labor too long on jurisdiction and, most important, that litigants can accurately predict the correct forum and choose to spend their money litigating the merits of their claim, rather than where it will be heard. Jurisdictional clarity largely is devoted …