Law Commons^™

The Reenactment And Inaction Doctrines In State Tax Litigation, Steve R. Johnson

Scholarly Publications

This installment of Interpretation Matters discusses two related canons of statutory interpretation and illustrates their use in state and local tax controversies. Assume that a state revenue agency or court construes a tax statute and that the construction is later challenged in another case. Between the two cases, the state legislature reenacts the provision without changing it or the legislature takes no action to amend the provision to overturn the construction in the first case. Some courts treat the reenactment without change, or even the inaction, as evidence that the legislature agreed with the construction in the first case, so …

Where Equity Meets Expertise: Re-Thinking Appellate Review In Complex Litigation, Michael J. Hays

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The field of complex litigation continues to grow as both an academic study and a popular phenomenon. One cannot escape news accounts of major class action litigation, and lawyers continue to find new ways to push the outer bounds of civil litigation practices to accommodate large-scale disputes involving multiple claims or parties. Many question whether traditional procedures can or should apply to these cases. Drawing on this well-recognized procedural tension, this Article explores the relationship between trial and appellate courts in complex litigation and argues for a revised standard of appellate review for trial court decisions affecting the party structure …

Proposed Legislation: A (Second) Modest Proposal To Protect Virginia Consumers Against Defective Products, Peter Nash Swisher

University of Richmond Law Review

The purpose of this article is to suggest a viable, necessary, and eminently reasonable legislative alternative that the Virginia General Assembly should enact for legitimate and pressing public policy reasons in order to properly protect Virginia consumers from defective and unreasonably dangerous consumer products.Adopting this alternative would bring the Commonwealth of Virginia into the mainstream of twenty-first century American, and transnational, products liability law.

Construction Law, D. Stan Barnhill

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Publicidad Desleal. Publicidad Comparativa. ¿Dónde Está El Límite?, Gabriel Martinez Medrano

Gabriel Martinez Medrano

No abstract provided.

Land Use, Water Conservation And Other Things To Think About, Dale Dekker

Publications

No abstract provided.

Overview Of The City's Demand Management Programs - Providing Water For Future Growth, Dale Lyons

Publications

No abstract provided.

Regulating Land Use - Protecting The Water, Joseph Quintana

Publications

No abstract provided.

Role Of The State - Ose Water Availability Opinions, John Longworth, P.E.

Publications

No abstract provided.

Are We Making The Land/Water Connection?, Lora A. Lucero

Publications

No abstract provided.

Land & Water Planning In The Middle Valley, Sandy Fish

Publications

No abstract provided.

Eyes Wide Shut: How Ignorance Of The Common Interest Doctrine Can Compromise Informed Consent, Katharine Traylor Schaffzin

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Article addresses the novel ethical problems presented by the common interest doctrine that implicate an attorney's duties of diligence, confidentiality, and loyalty to his or her client. These adverse effects of informal aggregation are not always fully considered before engaging a client in a common interest arrangement, but they should be. In Part II, this Article first explains the potential advantages that the common interest doctrine presents as an evidentiary tool, but then recognizes that exercise of the doctrine creates an undefined duty on the part of the attorney to the party with whom a client exchanges confidential information. …

Permanent Injunctions In Patent Cases, Dariush Keyhani

Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Securities Class Actions As Pragmatic Ex Post Regulation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Scholarly Works

Securities class actions are on the chopping block-again. Traditional commentators continue to view class actions with suspicion; they see class suits as nonmeritorious byproducts of self-interest and the attorneys who bring them as rent-seekers. Their conventional approach has popularized securities class actions' negative effects. High-profile commissions capitalizing on this rhetoric, such as the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, have recently recommended eliminating or severely curtailing securities class actions. But this approach misses the point: in the ongoing push and pull of securities regulation, corporations are winning the battle.

Thus, understanding the full picture and texture of securities class actions necessitates …

The Walker Process Doctrine: Infringement Lawsuits As Antitrust Violations, Herbert J. Hovenkamp

All Faculty Scholarship

Antitrust law's Walker Process doctrine permits a patent infringement defendant to show that an improperly maintained infringement action constitutes unlawful monopolization or an unlawful attempt to monopolize. The infringement defendant must show both that the lawsuit is improper, which establishes the conduct portion of the violation and generally satisfies tort law requirements, and also that the structural prerequisites for the monopolization offense are present. The doctrine also applies to non-patent infringement actions and has been applied by the Supreme Court to copyright infringement actions. Walker Process itself somewhat loosely derives from the Supreme Court's Noerr-Pennington line of cases holding that …

Brief Of Amici Curiae Former Fda Commissioners Dr. Donald Kennedy And Dr. David A. Kessler In Support Of Respondent, Wyeth V. Levine, No. 06-1249 (U.S. Aug. 14, 2008), Kathryn A. Sabbeth, David C. Vladeck

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

No abstract provided.

Regulation By Litigation, Andrew Morriss

Andrew P. Morriss

No abstract provided.

Jackpot Justice And The American Tort System: Thinking Beyond Junk Science, Tom Baker, Herbert M. Kritzer, Neil Vidmar

All Faculty Scholarship

In 2007 the Pacific Research Institute released a report, Jackpot Justice: The True Cost of America's Tort System, that is widely available on the internet. The conclusion of the report is that America's tort system costs $865.37 billion annually, amounting to an "annual price tag, or 'tort tax' for a family of four in terms of costs and foregone benefits" of $9,827. As our report will demonstrate, the conclusions of Jackpot Justice are without scientific merit and present a very misleading picture of the American tort system and its costs.

Research on the tort system's efficiency, its fairness and …

Water For Energy Development In Southern New Mexico: A Case Study Of The Duke Energy Luna Energy Facility, Tim De Young

Publications

No abstract provided.

Ethics, Professionalism And Politics, Ronald Kaiser

Publications

No abstract provided.

Spokane River & Aquifer: An Uncompacte Watershed, Rachael Paschal Osborn

Publications

No abstract provided.

The Model Interstate Water Compact, Utton Center, University Of New Mexico - School Of Law

Publications

No abstract provided.

Brackish Ground Water - An Untapped Resource For Energy Development?, John Shomaker

Publications

No abstract provided.

Congressional Concerns Related To The Energy-Water Nexus, Erik Webb

Publications

No abstract provided.

Federal Water R&D: Current Landscape, Future Goals And Emerging Technologies, Gene Whitney

Publications

No abstract provided.

Civil Resolution Of Ecclesiastical Disputes, Paul E. Salamanca

Law Faculty Popular Media

In this article for Bench & Bar Magazine (the Kentucky Bar Association's magazine), Professor Paul E. Salamanca discusses three historically prominent approaches to solving legal problems in ecclesiastical disputes.

Appellate Practice And Procedure, Robert G. Boliek Jr.

Mercer Law Review

If there is a single watchword for the Eleventh Circuit's decisions in 2007 in the arena of appellate practice and procedure, it is "jurisdiction." The requirement of a "final decision" received particular attention, as did the requirements for perfection of certain interlocutory appeals. The Eleventh Circuit also recognized an additional limitation on its jurisdiction over remand orders in removal cases. Accordingly, the first section of this Article will discuss cases that addressed questions of the Eleventh Circuit's appellate jurisdiction, followed by a section describing two notable cases that addressed the preservation and presentation of error. The final section discusses an …

Trial Practice And Procedure, John O'Shea Sullivan, Ashby L. Kent

Mercer Law Review

The 2007 survey period yielded several noteworthy decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit relating to federal trial practice and procedure, many of which concerned issues of first impression. This Article analyzes recent developments in the Eleventh Circuit, including significant rulings in the areas of class actions, civil procedure, subject matter jurisdiction, statutory interpretation, and other issues of interest to trial practitioners.

Abiquiu Reservoir Present And Future, Andrew Lieuwen, Ph.D.

Publications

No abstract provided.