Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Damages (2)
- Michigan (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- Alabama (1)
- Attorney fees (1)
-
- Authorship (1)
- Boundary disputes (1)
- Bureau of Internal Revenue (1)
- City of Jackson v. Mississippi Power & Light Co. (1)
- Code provisions (1)
- Compromise (1)
- Connecticut (1)
- Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp. (1)
- Consent (1)
- Craig v. Parkhurst (1)
- Death (1)
- Depositions (1)
- Dissolution (1)
- English Law (1)
- Estoppel (1)
- Expensa litis (1)
- Eye injury (1)
- Fair Labor Standards· Act (1)
- False representation (1)
- Fields (1)
- Financial records (1)
- Fitzpatrick v. International Ry (1)
- Fixed rates (1)
- Gas company (1)
- Groundless claims (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judgments - Propriety Of Finding That A Nonparty Conducted The Defense, David N. Mills
Judgments - Propriety Of Finding That A Nonparty Conducted The Defense, David N. Mills
Michigan Law Review
A patent infringement suit against a distributor was dismissed on the ground that plaintiff's patents were invalid. A finding was incorporated in the judgment that the defense had been "openly and avowedly conducted" by the manufacturer of the article distributed by defendant. Plaintiff objected that the finding "on its face would be a valid estoppel" in case plaintiff later wished to sue the manufacturer in a separate suit. Held, that plaintiff was entitled to have the finding deleted from the judgment since the finding was not necessary to a disposition of the issues between plaintiff and defendant. Minneapolis- Honeywell …
Damages - Expenses Of Litigation - Counsel Fees In A Previous Suit, Gerald M. Lively
Damages - Expenses Of Litigation - Counsel Fees In A Previous Suit, Gerald M. Lively
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs brought this appeal from a judgment dismissing an action to recover the attorney's fees and other expenses of the prosecution of a prior suit with defendant. In the former action plaintiffs had secured a decree requiring defendant to convey to them certain property which the defendant had withheld fraudulently and maliciously. In the present action defendant successfully had moved to dismiss on the grounds that attorney's fees as between original litigants were not recoverable and further that this claim was res judicata due to the prior suit. Held, one justice dissenting as defendant's intentional and wilful misconduct necessitated …
Federal Courts - Conflict Between The Federal Declaratory Judgments Act And The Johnson Act, Spencer E. Irons
Federal Courts - Conflict Between The Federal Declaratory Judgments Act And The Johnson Act, Spencer E. Irons
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff gas company contracted with defendant city to furnish gas from a certain field at rates fixed by ordinance. Plaintiff reserved the right, when this field became insufficient, to furnish gas from other fields at rates to be adjusted in accordance with the increased cost. In a suit in the federal district court for a declaratory judgment, plaintiff sought a determination that the local field had become insufficient, and that it was necessary to furnish gas from other fields. Plaintiff alleged that defendant city refused to recognize the changed conditions and insisted that plaintiff continue to furnish gas at the …
Negligence - Assumption Of Risk - Necessity For Contractual Relation, Edward H. Schlaudt
Negligence - Assumption Of Risk - Necessity For Contractual Relation, Edward H. Schlaudt
Michigan Law Review
While walking behind defendant through woodland, plaintiff suffered an eye injury caused by the negligence of the defendant in bending over a small sapling and allowing it to fly back and strike plaintiff. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground of assumption of risk, and appealed from a denial of the motion. Held, from the facts of the case, it cannot be ruled as a matter of law that the plaintiff knew and comprehended the danger which caused his injury and that he voluntarily exposed himself thereto, and, therefore, the judgment …
Litigation Problems Under The Social Security Act, Jack B. Tate
Litigation Problems Under The Social Security Act, Jack B. Tate
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Use In Statutory Interpretation, Reid J. Hatfield
Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Use In Statutory Interpretation, Reid J. Hatfield
Michigan Law Review
A mining company, subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, brought an action against the United States District Attorney for Idaho for a declaratory judgment that it was not subject to threatened criminal prosecutions and penalties under the act. The company had not included the forty minutes allowed for lunch in estimating the number of hours worked by its employees. The employees and their labor union threatened to sue, claiming the lunch period was part of their working hours and that they were therefore to that extent required to work overtime without extra pay. The Department of Labor and the …
Parties - Right To Sue Defendant By Fictitious Name, Oliver B. Crager
Parties - Right To Sue Defendant By Fictitious Name, Oliver B. Crager
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought an action of detinue to repossess an electric refrigerator against "John Doe, whose name is to the plaintiff otherwise unknown, but will be inserted by way of amendment when ascertained," in accordance with an Alabama statute allowing suits to be started against defendants by a fictitious name. Writ of seizure issued on the same date as the summons, but the sheriff did not make service. When it was found that the refrigerator was in the possession of a woman, plaintiff amended the complaint to substitute "Mary Roe, whose name is to the plaintiff otherwise unknown, etc." Service was …
Damages - Injunction Bond - Attorney's Fees As Damages, Harold P. Graves, Raymond H. Rapaport
Damages - Injunction Bond - Attorney's Fees As Damages, Harold P. Graves, Raymond H. Rapaport
Michigan Law Review
Frequently, when a litigant seeks to establish rights with respect to particular property, it is possible for the opposing party so to act with respect to the property involved, while litigation is pending, as to deprive the plaintiff of the substantial benefit of his remedy should he prevail. Consequently, on prima facie showing of right, courts of equity will grant a temporary injunction to "freeze" the situation until the rights of the parties are finally determined. Since the temporary injunction is issued without a final determination of the rights of the parties, the enjoined party is deprived of dominion over …
Husband And Wife-Wife's Right To Recover For Loss Of "Consortium" Due To Injury To Husband From Wrongful Sale Of Liquor, William C. Whitehead
Husband And Wife-Wife's Right To Recover For Loss Of "Consortium" Due To Injury To Husband From Wrongful Sale Of Liquor, William C. Whitehead
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued for loss of her right of consortium occasioned by the illness and death of her husband as a result of a sale of liquor by defendant in violation of a state statute. Defendant demurred on the ground that there was no cause of action granted by the statute for damages flowing from such an illegal sale. Held, an action for injury to the wife's right of consortium was available at common law. Swanson v. Ball, (S. D. 1940) 290 N. W. 482.
Boundaries By Agreement And Acquiescence, Harold M. Street
Boundaries By Agreement And Acquiescence, Harold M. Street
Michigan Law Review
An accurate summation of the present-day status of the doctrines of boundaries by agreement and acquiescence is contained in the, following statement made by an eminent text writer: "There are, in this country, a great number of decisions bearing upon the effect of an agreement by adjoining owners as to the boundary line between their lands, or of their recognition of a certain line as the boundary without any express agreement in relation thereto. These decisions are frequently most unsatisfactory in their discussion of the principles involved, and, purporting, as they variously do, to be based on principles of agreement, …
Federal Courts - Rules Of Federal Procedure - Production Of Designated Documents And Things Under Rule 34, William C. Wetherbee Jr.
Federal Courts - Rules Of Federal Procedure - Production Of Designated Documents And Things Under Rule 34, William C. Wetherbee Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued for damages and loss of profits caused by the unlawful acts of the defendant beginning in January, 1937. Under rule 34 of the new federal rules the defendant moved that the court order the plaintiff to produce its books showing the company's commercial results for the period prior to January 1, 1936; its duplicate federal income tax returns for the years 1934 to 1938; and all copies of statements furnished to any bank or credit company over a period of some five years. Held, motion granted in regard to books of account and duplicate income tax returns …
Substance And Procedure In The Conflict Of Laws, Edgar H. Ailes
Substance And Procedure In The Conflict Of Laws, Edgar H. Ailes
Michigan Law Review
It is perhaps the most inveterate doctrine of the conflict of laws that all questions of procedure in a given instance are governed by the lex fori, or the law of the court invoked, regardless of the law under which the substantive rights of the parties accrued. For seven centuries, at least, courts and lawyers have broadly stated or assumed to be axiomatic the rule that substantive rights are fixed and immutable whilst the procedural devices by which such rights may be vindicated and enforced depend solely upon the law of the forum.
Trust Mortgages - Effect Of Foreclosure Of Subsequent Mortgage As Prior Lien Under Subordination Agreement Of Which Bondholders Had No Knowledge, Rex B. Martin
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff held bonds secured by a trust mortgage. The trustee, Moore, without the consent of all the bondholders, had agreed to subordinate the trust mortgage to a subsequent mortgage. Defendant, the assignee of the subsequent mortgagee, foreclosed its mortgage as a prior lien. Moore was properly served but did not appear, as no bondholder agreed to pay the costs of the litigation. In the present suit to invalidate the subordinating agreement and reinstate the trust mortgage as the prior lien, held, the judgment in the foreclosure action determined the issue of priority and was conclusive against all the bondholders. …
Libel And Slander - Implied Representation That Plaintiff Consented To Write Her Love Story As Libel Per Se, Michigan Law Review
Libel And Slander - Implied Representation That Plaintiff Consented To Write Her Love Story As Libel Per Se, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought an action for libel against defendant for publishing in its magazine a story, which it represented as being written by plaintiff, purporting to relate indiscreet intimacies between plaintiff and a certain man. Defendant admitted the false representation of authorship, but requested a directed verdict after submitting in evidence testimony given by plaintiff in a prior law suit, in which she was said to have admitted intimacies fully as capable of bringing her into disrepute as were those published by defendant. On refusal by the court to direct a verdict, defendant excepted and appealed on the ground that the …
Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act - Right Of Prospective Bidder To Question Wage Determination Of Secretary Of Labor, David Loeb
Michigan Law Review
Complainants, small steel companies in eastern Pennsylvania, Maryland and Connecticut, brought this action to enjoin the secretary of labor and others from applying the provisions of the Public Contracts Act, as construed, to the iron and steel industry. It was contended that the secretary's wage determination was the result of an erroneous interpretation of the word "locality" as included in the act. The district court dismissed the complaint. Upon appeal the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia granted the injuction. On certiorari, held, reversed. The complainants have no standing in court to sue. Perkins v. Lukens Steel …