Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Climate change (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 2015 (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (1)
-
- Billy Frank Jr. (1)
- Boldt decision (1)
- Chevron deference (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- David Getches (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Elections (1)
- Elouise Cobell (1)
- Historic litigation (1)
- Indian Child Welfare Act (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- John Echohawk (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Menominee Restoration (1)
- NARF (1)
- Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1)
- Native American Rights Fund (1)
- Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission (1)
- Northwest Washington (1)
- Oregon (1)
- Pacific Northwest (1)
- Pragmatism (1)
- Pyramid Lake Paiutes (1)
- Race (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Spring 2015 Utton Center Newsletter, Utton Center, University Of New Mexico - School Of Law
Spring 2015 Utton Center Newsletter, Utton Center, University Of New Mexico - School Of Law
Publications
No abstract provided.
Optimizing Reservoir Operations To Adapt To 21st Century Expectations Of Climate And Social Change In The Willamette River Basin, Oregon, Kathleen M. Moore
Optimizing Reservoir Operations To Adapt To 21st Century Expectations Of Climate And Social Change In The Willamette River Basin, Oregon, Kathleen M. Moore
Publications
Reservoir systems in the western US are managed to serve two main competing purposes: to reduce flooding during the winter and spring, and to provide water supply for multiple uses during the summer. Because the storage capacity of a reservoir cannot be used for both flood damage reduction and water storage at the same time, these two uses are traded off as the reservoir fills during the transition from the wet to the dry season. Climate change, population growth, and development in the western US may exacerbate dry season water scarcity and increase winter flood risk, creating a need to …
They Had Nothing, Charles Wilkinson
Administering Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Douglas M. Spencer
Administering Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Douglas M. Spencer
Publications
Until the Supreme Court put an end to it in Shelby County v. Holder, section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was widely regarded as an effective, low-cost tool for blocking potentially discriminatory changes to election laws and administrative practices. The provision the Supreme Court left standing, section 2, is generally seen as expensive, cumbersome, and almost wholly ineffective at blocking changes before they take effect. This Article argues that the courts, in partnership with the Department of Justice, could reform section 2 so that it fills much of the gap left by the Supreme Court's evisceration of section …
A Pragmatic Approach To Interpreting The Federal Rules, Suzette M. Malveaux
A Pragmatic Approach To Interpreting The Federal Rules, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.