Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Compromises (2)
- Damages (2)
- Fraud (2)
- Liability (2)
- Administrative tribunals (1)
-
- Attorney fees (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Bank directors (1)
- Breach of restrictive covenant (1)
- Cestui que trusts (1)
- Child (1)
- County line (1)
- Dangerous materials (1)
- Derivative suits (1)
- Directors (1)
- Duffy bill (1)
- Equity Rule 58 (1)
- Erie Railroad v. Tompkins (1)
- Excessive suits (1)
- Falvey v. Foreman-State National Bank (1)
- Floyd county (1)
- Formula (1)
- Frank v. Metropolitan Insurance Co. (1)
- Gelpcke v. Dubuque (1)
- Guardian ad litem (1)
- Hughes v. Michoff (1)
- Inferences (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Insurance policies (1)
- Interests (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Contracts - Vendor's Agreement Not To Compete - Construction Of The Areement, Michigan Law Review
Contracts - Vendor's Agreement Not To Compete - Construction Of The Areement, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A South Carolina statute prohibited labor of employees in enumerated manufacturing and mercantile establishments for more than fifty-six hours per week or more than twelve hours in any one day. Plaintiffs were druggists who brought suit to restrain the commissioner of labor from enforcing the statute. A temporary restraining order was issued and the commissioner of labor appealed. Held, the statute was unconstitutional as in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses in both state and federal constitutions. Gasque, Inc. v. Nates, (S. C. 1939) 2 S. E. (2d) 36.
Corporations - Derivative Suits - Insolvency As A Bar, Edmund O'Hare
Corporations - Derivative Suits - Insolvency As A Bar, Edmund O'Hare
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, stockholder in defendant bank, brought a derivative suit against the bank's directors to recover moneys allegedly wrongfully appropriated by them from the bank's assets. Before the commencement of the suit the bank had become insolvent and was in the process of liquidation. Held, the directors' motion to dismiss should be granted, since a stockholder may not maintain an action to hold an insolvent corporation's directors liable for fraud or mismanagement unless it appears that he will be benefited by the relief demanded, and full recovery here would still leave an excess of liabilities over assets. Falvey v. Foreman-State …
Practice And Procedure - General Verdict On Several Counts - Is New Trial Necessary When One Of Two Counts Is Unsupported By Evidence?, Edmund R. Blaske
Practice And Procedure - General Verdict On Several Counts - Is New Trial Necessary When One Of Two Counts Is Unsupported By Evidence?, Edmund R. Blaske
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by him while in the employ of defendant, who was not under the workmen's compensation statute. In the first count of his declaration plaintiff claimed that defendant did not furnish him a safe place in which to work, and in the second count that defendant set him at work on dangerous materials. The jury returned a verdict of "guilty on both counts" and assessed "total damages" at $998.71. The trial court, on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, ruled that as a matter of …
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The National Labor Relations Board brought a proceeding under section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act for the enforcement of an order to cease certain unfair labor practices, its petition stating that the board had considered the case before it and upon all the testimony and evidence made its findings of fact and issued its order. The answer alleged that the board did not consider the evidence but referred it to others for suggested findings of fact, and that with no opportunity to respondent to know of or criticize the suggestions they were adopted by the board without further …
Corporations - Stockholders' Suits - Federal Courts -Requirement Of Stock Ownership At The Time Of The Injury Complained Of, Robert E. Sipes
Corporations - Stockholders' Suits - Federal Courts -Requirement Of Stock Ownership At The Time Of The Injury Complained Of, Robert E. Sipes
Michigan Law Review
When necessary to protect the interest of a stockholder, a court of equity will entertain an action by the stockholder to enforce a right belonging to the corporation. The suit is a derivative one, the corporation being the party primarily injured and the immediate beneficiary of the proceeds of any judgment. The basis for the suit has been explained in a number of ways. It has been held that in a proper case equity will disregard the corporate fiction and allow the derivative suit in order to protect the right which beneficially belongs to the stockholder although nominally to the …
A Warning Signal For Municipal Bondholders: Some Implications Of Erie Railroad V. Tompkins, Irvin Long
A Warning Signal For Municipal Bondholders: Some Implications Of Erie Railroad V. Tompkins, Irvin Long
Michigan Law Review
That branch of municipal bond litigation in which the character and validity of the obligations is involved has usually been conducted in the federal courts. Bondholders pressing for payment of their defaulted bonds usually are nonresidents of the state where the city, county or other defaulting municipality is located. Varying and contradictory state court decisions taught them that no settled rule of decision in the state courts could be expected. The arguments of their counsel, which many of the earlier volumes of the Supreme Court reports preserve, show that they distrusted a judiciary elected for short terms, as was the …
Corporations - Conditions Under Which Settlement Of Corporate Claims Will Not Prevent A Stockholder's Derivative Suit On Such Claims, John M. Ulman
Corporations - Conditions Under Which Settlement Of Corporate Claims Will Not Prevent A Stockholder's Derivative Suit On Such Claims, John M. Ulman
Michigan Law Review
In the recent case of United States Lines, Inc. v. United States Lines Co. the plaintiff was a minority stockholder in United States Lines, Inc., whose only asset was a minority stock interest in the United States Lines Company. A majority of the stock in both companies was owned by the International Mercantile Marine Company. An action originally brought by the United States Lines, Inc., but settled out of court, was sought to be continued by the plaintiff, who alleged: (1) that the Marine Company and its subsidiaries had entered into fraudulent contracts with the United States Lines Company and …
Evidence - Mailing - Inference Of Mailing Raised Through Proof Of Office Custom, Charles H. Haines
Evidence - Mailing - Inference Of Mailing Raised Through Proof Of Office Custom, Charles H. Haines
Michigan Law Review
In a suit on an accident insurance policy the defense of the insurer was that timely notice had been given of the revocation of the renewal privilege. At the trial, in order to raise the presumption that the notice was delivered to the insured, proof was offered that the letter was dictated and addressed in the large home office and given to the mail boy for posting according to the office custom. The letter was traced no further. On this evidence the court allowed the jury to find that the notice had been received. Plaintiff appealed. Held, reversed. The …
Negligence - Negligent Failure Of Principal To Promulgate Adequate Regulations For Safe Discharge Of Pupils, John M. Ulman
Negligence - Negligent Failure Of Principal To Promulgate Adequate Regulations For Safe Discharge Of Pupils, John M. Ulman
Michigan Law Review
The infant plaintiff, during the dismissal of her class, was pushed or thrown from an exterior stairway by a fellow pupil. As a consequence she sustained personal injuries. She sued the city, the board of education, the principal of the school, and the teacher. Held, that whether the principal was negligent in failing to promulgate more adequate regulations for the safe discharge of the pupils was a question of fact for the jury. Thompson v. Board of Education of City of New York, 255 App. Div. 786, 6 N. Y. S. (2d) 921 (1938).
The Measure Of Recovery In Actions For The Infringement Of Copyright, Julian Caplan
The Measure Of Recovery In Actions For The Infringement Of Copyright, Julian Caplan
Michigan Law Review
Since the present federal copyright statute was enacted in 1909, and especially quite recently, there have been repeated attempts at drastic modification of the law. Certain groups contend that the present statutory provisions are not of sufficient protection to the copyright proprietor, whereas other groups contend that the extent of the protection is entirely unwarranted. One of the chief phases of controversy has involved the measure of recovery in suits for infringement. The issue is of fundamental importance, since the measure of damages determines to a large extent how effective the other provisions of the statute will be. Whether, under …