Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Causes of action (2)
- Minnesota (2)
- New York (2)
- Service of process (2)
- Wisconsin (2)
-
- Actionable wrongs (1)
- Adjudications (1)
- Affirmative duty (1)
- Aiding and abetting (1)
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. Staff (1)
- Book reviews (1)
- Breaches of warranty (1)
- Building codes (1)
- Chubbuck v. Holloway (1)
- Claims (1)
- Coal (1)
- Code pleading (1)
- Conformity Act (1)
- Contumacy (1)
- Cross demands (1)
- Death (1)
- Depositions (1)
- Dexter and Carpenter (1)
- Diversity of citizenship (1)
- Duress (1)
- Durst v. Tautges Wilder & McDonald (1)
- Employees (1)
- Excessive amounts (1)
- Finzer v. Peter (1)
- Foreclosures (1)
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Michigan Law Review
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the federal court by defendant. Plaintiff's counsel in his opening statement said that as the result of the injuries one plaintiff was unable to work for two weeks and visited his doctor seven times and that the other was away from work for three weeks and also saw his doctor seven times. The wages of the first plaintiff were $55 a week; those of the second averaged $75 a week. He further stated that the injuries were not permanent, and that, except …
Mortgages-Assumption-Liability Of Grantees To Mortgagor
Mortgages-Assumption-Liability Of Grantees To Mortgagor
Michigan Law Review
Three successive grantees to a plot of land purchased it subject to a first and second mortgage and assumed the obligation to pay the notes which the mortgages secured. Foreclosure proceedings by the first mortgagee absorbed the entire value of the land. The second mortgagee then extended the time payment on the note to the last grantee without the consent or knowledge of the mortgagor or of the intermediate grantees. Such action released the intermediate grantees from liability on the note, for they were only secondarily liable, but did not release the mortgagor, for he as maker was primarily liable …
Conflict Of Laws-Foreign Tort-Survival Of Action
Conflict Of Laws-Foreign Tort-Survival Of Action
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, defendant, and defendant's intestate were all residents of Minnesota. Plaintiff was injured in Wisconsin due to the negligence of the defendant's intestate. Under Wisconsin statute (Laws of Wis., 1927, sec. 287.01) such cause of action survived against the estate of the wrongdoer. By express statute in Minnesota (Minn. Gen. Stat. 1923, sec. 9656) the rule of the common law applied to such actions and they abated on the death of the wrongdoer. Plaintiff sued the defendant executor in Minnesota. Held, that the lex loci delicti governed and the action did not abate. Chubbuck v. Holloway (Minn. 1931) 234 …
International Law--State Immunity--Waiver--Execution
International Law--State Immunity--Waiver--Execution
Michigan Law Review
Some interesting illustrations in the field of state immunity have been afforded by the litigation arising out of a contract made by the Swedish State Railways Administration (Kunglig Jamvagsstyrelsen) to buy coal from the American firm of Dexter and Carpenter, shortly after the War. Although the contract was on "c.i.f." terms, the National City Bank, in which funds for the payment for the coal had been deposited, paid for part of this coal- upon presentation of insurance certificates instead of policies. As a consequence, when one shipment of the coal was lost at sea, the Railways were unable to recover …
Landlord And Tenant-Interference With Possession Of Tenant As Basis For Suit By Landlord-Injunction
Landlord And Tenant-Interference With Possession Of Tenant As Basis For Suit By Landlord-Injunction
Michigan Law Review
In the recent case of Petty v. Langan the South Dakota court granted to a landlord an injunction restraining a third party who claimed the right to a lease, "from going upon the land or interfering witμ the right of plaintiff and his tenant to the possession thereof." No authority was cited by the court for the position it took, and the result is hard to square with orthodox views, but the holding appears sound on principle and desirable.
Process--Privilige Of Nonresident Attorney
Process--Privilige Of Nonresident Attorney
Michigan Law Review
The defendant, an attorney at law and resident of Minnesota, came into Wisconsin to take depositions to be used in suits pending in Minnesota. Upon arrival he and the witnesses were served with an injunction restraining the taking of the depositions. While awaiting a hearing upon the injunction, in which he intended to appear in his own behalf and as attorney for the witnesses, personal service of a Wisconsin summons in the instant action was made upon him, naming as defendants himself and the law firm of which he was a member. A motion to set aside the service of …
Contempt-Punishment Of One Not A Party To An Injunction
Contempt-Punishment Of One Not A Party To An Injunction
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff sued A and B for infringement of patent rights. The suit was dismissed as to A and B testified that the business was solely his. A decree was then entered against B, "his agents, employees, associates and confederates * * *," which enjoined them from "infringing, or aiding or abetting, or in any way contributing to the infringement * * *" of the patents. When the decree was entered, A was an employee of B, but subsequently A left B's employ, began his own business, and infringed the patent. The plaintiff began contempt proceedings against A in the …
Broad Counterclaims As Means Of Obtaining Jurisdiction Over Nonresidents
Broad Counterclaims As Means Of Obtaining Jurisdiction Over Nonresidents
Michigan Law Review
Broad counterclaim statutes are desirable because they allow cross demands to compensate each other, and because they avoid multiplicity of suits. These two advantages are alone sufficient to justify broad counterclaims, but there is a further advantage in that a broad counterclaim statute permits a resident in a suit brought against him by a nonresident to set up any independent claim against that nonresident which-he may have without prosecuting a separate action. Not only is it a heavier expense to bring a separate action, but it is often impossible to do so without going to the domicil of the nonresident …
Trusts - Cancellation - Beneficiaries As Necessary Parties
Trusts - Cancellation - Beneficiaries As Necessary Parties
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff deeded property to the defendants in trust, for herself for life and on her death to certain named persons. Plaintiff sued the defendants alone for revocation on the ground of fraud and duress. Held, the issue of fraud could not be tried in the absence of the living cestuis. McKnight v. Bank of N. Y. & Trust Co., 254 N. Y. 417, 173 N.E. 568.
Parent And Child-Education As A Necessary
Parent And Child-Education As A Necessary
Michigan Law Review
Defendant owned a farm where he and his family lived. He owned a car, paid his bills, and lived as comfortably as the average farmer. He provided piano lessons for his twelve-year old daughter, who showed an aptitude for music and was the pianist, of the neighborhood. For tuning a piano at the request of defendant's wife and daughter, plaintiff recovered a judgment of five dollars, based on a verdict that tuning the piano was a necessary for which defendant was liable. Held, that the amount being easily within the means of the father and the service necessary if …
Pleading-Limitations Of Actions
Pleading-Limitations Of Actions
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff's complaint, both as to the action for breach of warranty in the sale of condensed milk, and for a running account between October 17, 1917, and March 20, 1920, was drawn up in such a manner that in so far as the facts alleged in the complaint were concerned, the causes of action might have accrued. more than six years before this suit was started, that is, while it did not appear on the face of the complaint that the causes of action accrued more than six years prior to the bringing of this suit, yet, from all …
Cases On Pleadings And Procedure, Mason Ladd
Cases On Pleadings And Procedure, Mason Ladd
Michigan Law Review
A review of CASES ON PLEADINGS AND PROCEDURE By Charles E. Clark.
Covenants--Mistake Of Law--Warranty Against
Covenants--Mistake Of Law--Warranty Against
Michigan Law Review
The Municipal Metallic Bed Mfg. Co. leased a building from Dobbs in reliance on his representation that it was not illegal to manufacture in said building, and the lease contained a warranty to that effect, and a promise to indemnify the Bed Co. for any loss sustained in case it should prove illegal to use the building for the purpose intended. It later proved that due to the New York building code the building could not be used for manufacturing, and the Bed. Co. sued for the loss it sustained as a result. Held, plaintiff could recover on the …
Quasi-Contracts -- Recovery For Legal Services Rendered Under Champertous Contract
Quasi-Contracts -- Recovery For Legal Services Rendered Under Champertous Contract
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff agreed to render legal services to defendant in an action to recover a farm, payment to be either $5,000 in cash or one-third of the appraised value of the farm at the time of a judgment in defendant's favor. The defendant recovered, but refused to pay the plaintiffs anything on the ground that the contract was in violation of a Maine statute forbidding prosecution of a suit on shares. Plaintiff sued in assumpsit for the value of services rendered and expenses incurred. Held, the contract was illegal and so no relief of any nature would be granted. Hinckley …