Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- (in)valid (mis)information (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Automatic disclosure (1)
- Black box (1)
- Charles A. Sullivan (1)
-
- Civil litigation (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class certification (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Dismissal (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Error correction (1)
- Habeas (1)
- Information (1)
- Information behavior (1)
- Inverse condemnation (1)
- Iqbal (1)
- Judicial accountability (1)
- Judicial immunity (1)
- Judicial prospectively (1)
- Judicial takings (1)
- Juries (1)
- Juror testimony (1)
- Jury (1)
- Mandamus (1)
- Moral hazard (1)
- Peremptory challenges (1)
- Plausibility pleading (1)
- Political economy (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Information Lost And Found, Frederic M. Bloom
Information Lost And Found, Frederic M. Bloom
Publications
At the core of every lawsuit is a mix of information-revealing documents that chronicle a party's malfeasance, guarded memos that outline a lawyer's trial strategy, fading memories that recall a jury's key mistakes. Yet the law's system for managing that information is still poorly understood. This Article makes new and better sense of that system. It begins with an original examination of five pieces of our civil information architecture--evidence tampering rules, automatic disclosure requirements, work product doctrine, peremptory challenge law, and bans on juror testimony--and compiles a novel study of how those doctrines intersect and overlap. It then fits these …
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Suing Courts, Frederic Bloom, Christopher Serkin
Suing Courts, Frederic Bloom, Christopher Serkin
Publications
This Article argues for a new and unexpected mechanism of judicial accountability: suing courts. Current models of court accountability focus almost entirely on correcting legal errors. A suit against the court would concentrate on something different--on providing transition relief, by way of legal remedy, to those bearing the heaviest burdens of desirable legal change. These suits may at first appear impossible. But suing courts is conceptually rational and mechanically reasonable, a tool that eases legal transitions while navigating the many hurdles modern doctrine puts in the way. This Article sets out the first complete account of how, where, and why …