Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Causes of action (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- England (1)
- Equity (1)
- Fraud (1)
-
- History (1)
- Janus Capital Group Inc. v. First Derivative Traders (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legislative interpretation (1)
- Liability (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Middle Ages (1)
- Private rights of action (1)
- Rulemaking authority (1)
- Securities Exchange Act (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Two Faces Of Janus: The Jurisprudential Past And New Beginning Of Rule 10b-5, John Patrick Clayton
The Two Faces Of Janus: The Jurisprudential Past And New Beginning Of Rule 10b-5, John Patrick Clayton
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and its implementing Rule 10b-5 are the primary antifraud provisions for both private and public enforcement of the federal securities laws. Neither the statute nor the rule expressly provides for a private right of action, but federal courts have long recognized such an implied right, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has supported the implied private right of action as a “necessary supplement” to its own efforts. However, after a decade of applying an expansive interpretation to Section 10(b), in the early 1970s the U.S. Supreme Court began to narrowly interpret this implied …
Parallel Justice: Creating Causes Of Action For Mandatory Mediation, Marie A. Failinger
Parallel Justice: Creating Causes Of Action For Mandatory Mediation, Marie A. Failinger
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The American common law system should adopt court-connected mandatory mediation as a parallel system of justice for some cases that are currently not justiciable, such as wrongs caused by constitutionally protected behavior. As evidence that such a system is practical, this Article describes systemic and ethical parallels between court-connected mediation and the rise of the equity courts in medieval England, demonstrating that there are no insurmountable practical objections to the creation of “mediation-only” causes of action. The Article then explores the constitutional concerns surrounding the idea of “mandatory mediation-only” causes of action, using constitutional hate speech and invasion of privacy …