Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Progressivist Origins Of The 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, Kira L. Klatchko
Progressivist Origins Of The 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, Kira L. Klatchko
ExpressO
Progressivist Origins of the 2003 California Gubernatorial Recall, was written in Sacramento in the midst of the first statewide recall of an elected official in California. The paper explores the nature of the recall procedure and its implementation in the state, and is chiefly an inquiry into the relatedness of the current incarnation and its Progressivist root. It focuses particularly on the recall of Governor Gray Davis, and details how shifting attitudes towards public participation have altered the procedure over time.
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Antitrust And Trade Regulation Law, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Creekmore, Ellen S. Moore
Antitrust And Trade Regulation Law, Michael F. Urbanski, James R. Creekmore, Ellen S. Moore
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
Legal Issues Involving Children, Robert E. Shepherd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Real Estate Law, Brian R. Marron, Christopher M. Gill
Real Estate Law, Brian R. Marron, Christopher M. Gill
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taxation, Craig D. Bell
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant?, Pannal A. Sanders
United States V. Bean: Shoveling After The Elephant?, Pannal A. Sanders
ExpressO
Thomas Bean’s felony conviction in Mexico implicated provisions of federal law that preclude certain persons, including specified felons, from owning or trading in firearms and ammunition which have been transported in interstate commerce. 18 USC Sec. 922. Affected persons can seek relief from the federal firearms disability by invoking procedures established in 18 USC Sec. 925(c) under the Dept of Treasury, Director of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“ATF”). Beginning in 1992, Congress has enacted provisions annually in the ATF’s appropriations laws that ban it from investigating or acting upon Sec. 925(c) applications from individuals. Section 925(c) contains provisions for judicial …
The Philadelphia Story: The Rhetoric Of School Reform, Susan Dejarnatt
The Philadelphia Story: The Rhetoric Of School Reform, Susan Dejarnatt
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Resource Parity For Defense Counsel And The Struggle Between Public Choice And Public Ideals, Ronald F. Wright
Resource Parity For Defense Counsel And The Struggle Between Public Choice And Public Ideals, Ronald F. Wright
ExpressO
The quality of criminal defense counsel desperately needs improving. The strategy this article explores is not a change in the legal standard governing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, or a change in the Supreme Court's reasoning, but something far more fundamental: money. I ask whether it is feasible to link the funding available for defense lawyers to the money that the government spends on prosecution lawyers - in other words, parity of resources.
For reasons described in this article, resource parity will probably not come from the courts, at least not if they act alone. Major funding changes like this …
In The Name Of National Security Or Insecurity?: The Potential Indefinite Detention Of Non-Citizen Certified Terrorists In The United States And The United Kingdom In The Aftermath Of September 11, 2001, Dana L. Keith
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Against Preemption: How Federalism Can Improve The National Legislative Process, Roderick Hills
Against Preemption: How Federalism Can Improve The National Legislative Process, Roderick Hills
Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009
How easily should courts infer that federal statutes preempt state law? An ongoing debate exists on the question in Congress and among scholars and judges. One side calls for judges to protect federalism by adopting a rule of statutory construction that would bar preemption absent a clear statement of preemptive intent. Opponents argue against such a "clear statement" rule by arguing that state control over preemptable topics is often presumptively inefficient, because common-law juries lack expertise and because states are prone to imposing external costs on their neighbors. This article sidesteps these debates over preemption and instead argues that, quite …
Legislative Watch , Ossai Miazad
Legislative Focus: Senate Action To Protect Innocent Inmates On Death Row, Ossai Miazad
Legislative Focus: Senate Action To Protect Innocent Inmates On Death Row, Ossai Miazad
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
Legislative Watch, Human Rights Brief
Legislative Focus: Congress Condemns Executions By Stoning, Chanté Lasco
Legislative Focus: Congress Condemns Executions By Stoning, Chanté Lasco
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.