Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Closing (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal law committee (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Disparate impact suits (1)
- Economic crime (1)
- Economic crime offenders (1)
- Economics (1)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (1)
- Good faith estimate (1)
- HUD-1 (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Loan (1)
- Mortgage (1)
- Mortgage broker (1)
- RESPA (1)
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (1)
- Regulation X (1)
- Sentences (1)
- Settlement statement (1)
- Yield spread premium (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Editor's Observations: The 2001 Economic Crime Package: A Legislative History, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Editor's Observations: The 2001 Economic Crime Package: A Legislative History, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
On April 6, 2001, the U.S. Sentencing Commission approved a group of amendments to guidelines governing the sentencing of economic crimes. These measures, collectively known to as the “economic crime package,” are the culmination of some six years of deliberations by both the Conaboy and Murphy Sentencing Commissions working together with interested outside groups such as the defense bar, the Justice Department, probation officers, and the Criminal Law Committee of the U.S. Judicial Conference, The package contains three basic components. First, the now-separate theft and fraud guidelines, Sections 2B1.1 and 2F1.1, will be consolidated into a single guideline. Second, the …
The Case Against Private Disparate Impact Suits, Thom Lambert
The Case Against Private Disparate Impact Suits, Thom Lambert
Faculty Publications
This article argues that the Third Circuit, and the courts that have implicitly approved private disparate impact suits, have erred in construing Title VI to permit private plaintiffs to sue federally funded entities for discrimination based on disparate impact alone. From a policy standpoint, permitting private disparate impact suits is a bad idea, for the threat of such suits will lead to deterrence of actions and decisions that have incidental disparate effects but are, on the whole, good.
Respa - Questioning Its Effectiveness, Eloisa Rodriguez-Dod
Respa - Questioning Its Effectiveness, Eloisa Rodriguez-Dod
Faculty Publications
Purchasing real estate is a complicated process, especially for the average consumer. The closing procedure alone involves fees and documents that can be confusing to a borrower. The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) was enacted in 1974 in order to ease some of this confusion.
This article discusses the enactment of RESPA and its purpose, which is mainly to "insure that consumers... are provided with greater and more timely information on the nature and costs of the settlement process and are protected from unnecessarily high settlement charges caused by certain abusive practices." The article also discusses disclosure requirements that …