Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to information (1)
- Compilations (1)
- Copyright Act of 1909 (1)
- Copyright Act of 1976 (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
-
- Copyright protection (1)
- Creativity (1)
- Databases (1)
- Facts (1)
- Fair use (1)
- Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. (1)
- File sharing (1)
- Grokster (1)
- Incentives (1)
- Inducement (1)
- Industrious collection (1)
- Information (1)
- Internet (1)
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. v. Grokster Inc. (1)
- Patent Act of 1952 (1)
- Secondary liability (1)
- Technology (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Intent Element Of Inducement To Infringe Under Patent Law: Reflections On Grokster, Lynda J. Oswald
The Intent Element Of Inducement To Infringe Under Patent Law: Reflections On Grokster, Lynda J. Oswald
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
In June, 2005, the United States Supreme Court set forth an "inducement" rule in MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. that imposes secondary liability on "one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement." The Court emphasized the limitations of the liability standard it was setting forth, stating that the target was only "purposeful, culpable expression and conduct, and thus does nothing to compromise legitimate commerce or discourage innovation having a lawful promise." Yet, the liability standard set forth in Grokster …
Trends In Protection For Informational Works Under Copyright Law During The 19th And 20th Centuries, Miriam Bitton
Trends In Protection For Informational Works Under Copyright Law During The 19th And 20th Centuries, Miriam Bitton
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The debate over databases protection has failed to identify and discuss some of its most basic and preliminary assumptions, accepting instead many of the historical aspects involved as given. This Article therefore seeks to challenge these underlying assumptions by providing a fresh look at the historical dimension of the debate. One common argument regarding database protection is that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Feist v. Rural Publications Inc. brought about a dramatic change in the legal landscape, displacing the then-accepted "sweat of the brow" rationale for protecting rights in databases. This Article's historical analysis therefore thoroughly examines the treatment …