Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Benefits (2)
- DOMA (2)
- Defense of Marriage Act (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Familial status (2)
-
- LGBT (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Marriage (2)
- Polygamy (2)
- Same-sex marriage (2)
- AIDS (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Chapter 11 (1)
- Choice (1)
- Compulsion (1)
- Consent (1)
- Costs (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (1)
- Gender and law (1)
- HIV (1)
- Hawaii (1)
- Medical testing (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Ryan White Care Act (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Testing Testing, Carl E. Schneider
Testing Testing, Carl E. Schneider
Articles
Last year, Congress passed the Ryan White Care Act Amendments of 1996. The amendments authorize ten million dollars for each fiscal year from 1996 through 2000 for counseling pregnant women on HIV disease, for "outreach efforts to pregnant women at high risk of HN who are not currently receiving prenatal care," and for voluntary testing for pregnant women. The amendments compromise a central question: whether prenatal and neonatal AIDS testing should be compelled. The compromise is complex. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is instructed to establish a system for states to use to discover and …
The Virtue Of Speed In Bankruptcy Proceedings, James J. White
The Virtue Of Speed In Bankruptcy Proceedings, James J. White
Articles
In my opinion the principal difficulty with Chapter 11 is that it gives strong incentives to various Chapter 11 players to distort the priorities that were intended by Congress.
Polygamy And Same-Sex Marriage, David L. Chambers
Polygamy And Same-Sex Marriage, David L. Chambers
Articles
In the American federal system, state governments bear the responsibility for enacting the laws that define the persons who are permitted to marry. The federal government, throughout our history, has accepted these definitions and built upon them, fixing legal consequences for those who validly marry under state law. Only twice in American history has Congress intervened to reject the determinations that states might make about who can marry. The first occasion was in the late nineteenth century when Congress enacted a series of statutes aimed at the Mormon Church, prohibiting polygamy in the Western territories and punishing the Church and …
Marriage Today: Legal Consequences For Same Sex And Opposite Sex Couples, David L. Chambers
Marriage Today: Legal Consequences For Same Sex And Opposite Sex Couples, David L. Chambers
Articles
Laws that treat married persons in a different manner than they treat single persons permeate nearly every field of social regulation in this country -- taxation, otrts, evidence, social welfare, inheritance, adoption, and on and on.