Law Commons^™

Bill To Amend Title 35, U.S. Code, To Conform Certain Filing Provisions Within The Patent And Trademark Office, 109th Cong., Sept. 14, 2006 (Statement Of Statement Of John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas

Testimony Before Congress

No abstract provided.

Line-Item Veto: Constitutional Issues: Hearing Before The H. Comm. On The Budget, 109th Cong., June 8, 2006 (Statement Of Viet D. Dinh, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Viet D. Dinh

Testimony Before Congress

No abstract provided.

Hearing On Corporate Tax Reform: Hearing Before The Subcomm. On Select Revenue Measures Of The H. Comm. On Ways And Means, 109th Cong., May 9, 2006 (Statement Of Professor Ronald A. Pearlman, Geo. U. L. Center), Ronald A. Pearlman

Testimony Before Congress

No abstract provided.

Cfius And The Role Of Foreign Direct Investment In The U.S.: Hearing Before The Subcomm. On Domestic And International Monetary Policy, Trade And Technology Of The H. Comm. On Financial Services, 109th Cong., Apr. 27, 2006 (Statement Of Professor Daniel K. Tarullo, Geo. U. L. Center), Daniel K. Tarullo

Testimony Before Congress

No abstract provided.

Examples Of State Flexible Work Arrangement (Fwa) Laws, Workplace Flexibility 2010, Georgetown University Law Center

Charts and Summaries of State, U.S., and Foreign Laws and Regulations

Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs) alter the time and/or place that work is conducted on a regular basis -- in a manner that is as manageable and predictable as possible for both employees and employers. This document charts examples of state FWA laws.

Brief Of Respondents, Arlington Central School District Board Of Education V. Murphy, No. 05-18 (U.S. Mar 28, 2006), Jillian M. Cutler, David C. Vladeck

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

No abstract provided.

Are We Safer?, David Cole

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

No abstract provided.

Brief For Respondents American Rivers And Friends Of The Presumpcot River, S.D. Warren Co. V. Maine Bd. Of Envtl. Prot., No. 04-1527 (U.S. Jan. 6, 2006), Richard J. Lazarus

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

No abstract provided.

Legislatures, Agencies, Courts And Advocates: How Laws Are Made, Interpreted And Modified, Chai R. Feldblum, Robin Appleberry

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This chapter explains the nature and practice of lawmaking, legal advocacy, and legal research as they relate to the field of work and family. Through reference to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 as a case study, the authors explain the dynamic processes by which laws are made, interpreted and modified by legislatures, administrative agencies and courts, with the help of legal advocates. Their goal is not to provide substantive analysis of laws related to work and family, but rather to enable researchers from a range of disciplines to understand and access the legal system, as it currently …

Internal Separation Of Powers: Checking Today's Most Dangerous Branch From Within, Neal K. Katyal

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The standard conception of separation of powers presumes three branches with equivalent ambitions of maximizing their powers. Today, however, legislative abdication is the reigning modus operandi. Instead of bemoaning this state of affairs, this piece asks how separation of powers can be reflected within the Executive Branch when that branch, not the legislature, is making much law today. The first-best concept of legislature v. executive checks-and-balances has to be updated to contemplate second-best executive v. executive divisions.

A critical mechanism to promote internal separation of powers is bureaucracy. Much maligned by both the political left and right, bureaucracy serves crucial …