Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ALWD Guide (1)
- Acknowledgment (1)
- Article selection (1)
- Bluebook (1)
- Citation (1)
-
- Curriculum; Education (General); Legal Analysis and Writing; Law Students; Legal Education; Students (1)
- Footnotes (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Gender bias (1)
- Hate speech and extremism (1)
- Interleaving (1)
- Law professors (1)
- Law reviews (1)
- Learning (1)
- Legal writing (1)
- Literature review (1)
- Multi-tasking (1)
- Peer review (1)
- Productivity (1)
- Racial justice (1)
- Recall (1)
- Scholarship (1)
- Study skills (1)
- Studying (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Editing And Interleaving, Patrick Barry
Editing And Interleaving, Patrick Barry
Articles
This essay suggests that a powerful learning strategy called "interleaving"--which involves strategically switching between cognitive tasks--is being underused. It can do more than make study sessions more productive; it can also make editing sessions more productive.
Teaching Written Advocacy In A Law Clinic Setting, Tamar Ezer
Teaching Written Advocacy In A Law Clinic Setting, Tamar Ezer
Articles
Written advocacy is a critical lawyering skill and vital component of student work in many clinics. This is certainly true in appellate advocacy and policy-based clinics, such as my own focused on human rights advocacy. Teaching written advocacy requires a deliberate and thoughtful pedagogy, just as with other aspects of clinical teaching. There is a rich literature on teaching legal writing, but only sparse discussion of its applicability in the fast-paced law clinic setting, where written products have real world consequences and need to be of high quality. This article delves into this literature and argues that written advocacy consists …
Acknowledgements As A Window Into Legal Academia, Jonathan Tietz, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Acknowledgements As A Window Into Legal Academia, Jonathan Tietz, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Articles
Legal scholarship in the United States is an oddity—an institution built on student editorship, a lack of peer review, and a dramatically high proportion of solo authorship. It is often argued that this makes legal scholarship fundamentally different from scholarship in other fields, which is largely peer-reviewed by academics. We use acknowledgments in biographical footnotes from law review articles to probe the nature of legal knowledge co-production and de facto peer review in the legal literature. Using a survey and a textual analysis of about thirty thousand law review articles from 2008 to 2017, we examined the nature of knowledge …
The Folly Of The Embedded Full Citation: How The Bluebook And Alwd Manuals Encourage Weak Legal Writing, Ben Bratman
The Folly Of The Embedded Full Citation: How The Bluebook And Alwd Manuals Encourage Weak Legal Writing, Ben Bratman
Articles
Unfortunately, the two most prominent citation guides for legal writing, the Bluebook and the ALWD Guide to Legal Citation, include provisions allowing legal writers to embed a full citation to legal authority as a grammatical element of a textual sentences. As a result, both beginning and experienced legal writers do not hesitate to burden their sentences with the clutter of full citations. Most dubiously, legal writers far too often begin the topic sentence of a paragraph with the phrase “In [case name],” followed by an embedded citation, thereby wrongly emphasizing the case name instead of the legal principle that the …
Race And The First Amendment: A Compendium Of Resources, Solomon F. Worlds, Leonard M. Niehoff
Race And The First Amendment: A Compendium Of Resources, Solomon F. Worlds, Leonard M. Niehoff
Articles
This article provides summaries of law review articles and books that consider the complex relationship between racial justice and free speech. It seeks to assist law students, legal scholars, judges, and practitioners to think more deeply about the intersection between these critically important values. It describes scholarship that views these values as complementary, but also scholarship that views them as conflicting.